[Grammar] Facebook "Who do you want to message?"

Status
Not open for further replies.

Stephen Eckelberry

New member
Joined
Apr 14, 2013
Member Type
Interested in Language
Native Language
English
Home Country
United States
Current Location
United States
I saw this on Facebook, and wonder about the grammar. Shouldn't it be "Whom do you want to message?" Because in fact if this sentence weren't a question it would be "I want to message __", and therefore 'who' should be in the objective case, not the subjective.
 
Purists insist that only 'whom' is correct. In British English, few people would say 'whom'; A few more might write it, but not many. 'Who' is acceptable; indeed, it is more natural for most speakers of BrE.
 
Last edited:
I think anyone who insisted on 'whom' there would splutter over their Corn Flakes at that use of 'message' too. ;-)

b
 
5jj's reply is probably even more correct in AmE than in BrE. Nobody, but nobody, ever says whom in North America. Once in a blue moon I think about saying whom, and then I double clutch and go "Whoa, what were you thinking?' ;-)
 
Oooo! I haven't double de-clutched for a very, very long time! ;-) :)
R21
 
I saw this on Facebook, and wonder about the grammar. Shouldn't it be "Whom do you want to message?" Because in fact if this sentence weren't a question it would be "I want to message __", and therefore 'who' should be in the objective case, not the subjective.

Computing takes a very relaxed approach to a number of grammar issues- forums not fora, etc. However, the who/whom distinction has been eroded to such an extent that it is impossible to say that this sentence is an error nowadays. In the most formal contexts, you could make a case for whom being preferable but Facebook is not such a context.
 
5jj's reply is probably even more correct in AmE than in BrE. Nobody, but nobody, ever says whom in North America.
That surprises me. When I was still training, not that long ago, I had several young American trainees who insisted that 'whom' was widely used. With one or two, I had to produce grammar books to prove that my claims about the acceptability of 'who' was not a crackpot idea of my own.
 
I must disagree with Probus.
"Whom" is alive and well when it comes immediately after a preposition. It is certainly highly unlikely to show up as the first word in the subject sentence, though.
 
I must disagree with Probus.
"Whom" is alive and well when it comes immediately after a preposition. It is certainly highly unlikely to show up as the first word in the subject sentence, though.

That is also true in BrE.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top