Is the following sentence grammatical?
If Cleopatra's nose had been shortened, the history of the world would have been rewritten.
Sorry, I made a mistake by putting the word "shorter" replaced by "shortened". I revised the sentence as written. Is it grammatical?
Can the word "flatter" substitute for "shorter" ?
If Cleopatra's nose had been shorter, the history of the world would have been rewritten.
If Cleopatra's nose had been flatter, the history of the world would have been rewritten.
[FONT="]Pensées : [/FONT][FONT="]Le nez de Cléopâtre, s'il eût été plus court, toute la face de la terre aurait changé.[/FONT][FONT="]Either sentence is grammatical, although, as assertions, both would probably be considered bizarre by most people!
I can see how history might have been different if Cleopatra's nose had been shorter (assuming that Mark Antony liked long noses, etc.) But I think Pascal was wrong in claiming that, had Cleopatra's nose been shorter, history would have changed.[FONT="]Pensées : [/FONT][FONT="]Le nez de Cléopâtre, s'il eût été plus court, toute la face de la terre aurait changé.[/FONT]
[FONT="]The nose of Cleopatra, if it had been shorter, would have changed all the face of the earth’[/FONT]
[FONT="]http://en.wikiquote.org/wiki/Blaise_Pascal[/FONT]
. Does it make more sense in the original?
I don't have a problem interpreting that to mean the history of the world TO DATE. I don't infer it means all of "history" is over. Was that your first impression?
I don't have a problem interpreting that to mean the history of the world TO DATE. I don't infer it means all of "history" is over. Was that your first impression?
But that is the problem I have with Pascal's quote. History would not be rewritten, or have been rewritten, or need to be rewritten. History as it was with Cleopatra having had a long nose would not have occurred in the first place if she had had a short nose, and hence that long-nosed history would not have existed to be rewritten.If Cleo's nose had been shorter (which it wasn't) then the history of the next 2000 years would have been rewritten (which it wasn't).
I like that.You are making my brain hurt.
... our history would have been different. How about that?
You are making my brain hurt.
... our history would have been different. How about that?
As a final response from me, I still can't fathom why history would need writing twice given only one nose. But occasionally things arise that I just can't grasp!BarbD: As my final response on this post (aren't you glad? ) and sleepless nights, I think I would have preferred to see, "If Cleopatra's nose had been shortened, the history of the world would have to have been rewritten".
As a final response from me, I still can't fathom why history would need writing twice given only one nose. But occasionally things arise that I just can't grasp!