would+have+past participle

Status
Not open for further replies.
Joined
Jul 24, 2007
Member Type
Other
Native Language
Malayalam
Home Country
India
Current Location
India
Could anyone explain the possible meanings of would+have+past participle with suitable examples?
 

Raymott

VIP Member
Joined
Jun 29, 2008
Member Type
Academic
Native Language
English
Home Country
Australia
Current Location
Australia
Could anyone explain the possible meanings of would+have+past participle with suitable examples?
Why don't you tell us what you understand already? Do you understand,"I would have bought a car if I had the money"?
How about you write out five different sentences with "would have pp." and say what you think they mean.
 
Joined
Jul 24, 2007
Member Type
Other
Native Language
Malayalam
Home Country
India
Current Location
India
Like,'For the most part of the book consists of several series of revelations and visions presented in symbolic language that would have been understood by Christians of that day, but would have remained a mystery to all others'.
 

Raymott

VIP Member
Joined
Jun 29, 2008
Member Type
Academic
Native Language
English
Home Country
Australia
Current Location
Australia
Like,'For the most part of the book consists of several series of revelations and visions presented in symbolic language that would have been understood by Christians of that day, but would have remained a mystery to all others'.
OK, that's a more specific and reasonable question.
To understand "would have been understood", you need to understand "would have been", and hence "would" and "have been".
I'll assume you have some idea of the basic concepts of these words.
Let me reduce the sentence, "The book was in symbolic language that would have been understood by Christians."

This is the passive form of the active sentence "Christians would have understood it (while others would not have)."
Now, this is an assumption made by this historian. If he knew for certain and had evidence, he would say "Christians understood it" (It was understood by Christians - passive). But he is making an estimation, based on all he knows about the history, that "Christians would have understood it" - they must have understood it. He cannot imagine them not understanding it.

This is not a conditional sentence. He's not saying, "Christians would have understood it if they could read."

Let's look at some easier examples:
A: Your wife swore at me yesterday!
B: Oh, she wouldn't have done that! (It's very unlikely that she would do that.)

Policeman: "WHat were you doing on the afternoon of June 12th last year?"
Suspect: "Oh, I would have been as work." (He cannot say for sure, but that's the most likely possibility)

There's a start. If you are still having trouble and if no one else chimes in with a better explanation, I'll have another go tomorrow when I'm not so tired. :)
 
  • Like
Reactions: 5jj
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top