Does "after her 8-week gestation since menolipsis" sound natural?

Status
Not open for further replies.

NewHopeR

Senior Member
Joined
Nov 6, 2009
Member Type
Student or Learner
Native Language
Chinese
Home Country
China
Current Location
China
The examination conducted after her 8-week gestation since menolipsis showed everything going well.
 
The examination conducted after her 8-week gestation since menolipsis showed everything going well.

It doesn't make sense. Try, "The examination conducted after 8 weeks gestation showed everything going well."
 
:up: If gestation is happening, menolipsis must have occurred, so there's no need to use it.

b
 
If anybody's wondering. . .

menolipsis [men″o-lip´sis]temporary cessation of menstruation.
Miller-Keane Encyclopedia and Dictionary of Medicine, Nursing, and Allied Health, Seventh Edition. © 2003 by Saunders, an imprint of Elsevier, Inc. All rights reserved.

Rover
(Not a gynaecologist)
 
Rover
(Not a gynaecologist)

:loling: That should really be your new signature line Rover!

If gestation is happening then menolipsis must have occurred, I agree. The reverse is not true though, in case anyone else was wondering!
 
The examination conducted after her 8-week gestation since menolipsis showed everything going well.
Menolipsis? I've never heard the term. Has anyone else?
We call it amenorrhoea or a 'missed period'. Where did you find 'menolipsis' used?
 
In the US, they would refer to how many weeks since LMP (last menstrual period).
 
Menolipsis? I've never heard the term. Has anyone else?
We call it amenorrhoea or a 'missed period'. Where did you find 'menolipsis' used?

Amenorrhea seems to be "absence of period" but menolipsis specifically "temporary/temporal absence".
 
Amenorrhea seems to be "absence of period" but menolipsis specifically "temporary/temporal absence".
In 23 years of medical practice, I've never heard the term 'menolipsis'. That's the point I was making.
When you have a patient with amenorrhoea (for one month or 10 years), you can't tell if it's menolipsis or not until/unless she gets another period. It's necessarily a term you can only use in hindsight: "She went for a period of three months with menolipsis/amenorrhea last year." I can't see that the term has any benefit over 'amenorrhoea', and Australian doctors and US and British Obstetric textbooks don't use the term. That's why I was wondering where NewHope found it.
 
In 23 years of medical practice, I've never heard the term 'menolipsis'. That's the point I was making.
When you have a patient with amenorrhoea (for one month or 10 years), you can't tell if it's menolipsis or not until/unless she gets another period. It's necessarily a term you can only use in hindsight: "She went for a period of three months with menolipsis/amenorrhea last year." I can't see that the term has any benefit over 'amenorrhoea', and Australian doctors and US and British Obstetric textbooks don't use the term. That's why I was wondering where NewHope found it.

Well, you should know!! But for info, I searched it and found it here and here. However, it doesn't come up in the online OED now that I've checked. I only searched for it because it had been posted here. I'd certainly never heard of it before - understandably as I have absolutely no days of medical practice, let alone years!
 
Well, you should know!! But for info, I searched it and found it here and here. However, it doesn't come up in the online OED now that I've checked. I only searched for it because it had been posted here. I'd certainly never heard of it before - understandably as I have absolutely no days of medical practice, let alone years!
Yes, you can find it in dictionaries. Can you find it in any Western medical texts or articles?
 
Yes, you can find it in dictionaries. Can you find it in any Western medical texts or articles?

Honestly, I didn't look. I'm not saying it's used. I simply didn't query it because having seen it, realising I'd never heard it before, I shoved it into Google and clicked on the first three hits. At that point, I didn't take any notice of which dictionaries they were or whether any of them were medicine-related. I went with the fact that the word appeared to exist, was spelt correctly and seemed to mean what the OP thought it meant. When it comes to specialist terminology, I certainly wouldn't try to advise a student on whether or not a word is actually used within those specialist circles. That is, quite rightly, for people like you to do! :-D
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top