Dominik92
Member
- Joined
- May 4, 2015
- Member Type
- Native Language
- Czech
- Home Country
- Czech Republic
- Current Location
- Czech Republic
Hello all!
When can I use the following two sentences? Wimbledon 2005 was the best torunament in my career./Wimbledon 2005 had been the best torunament in my career.
I got this answer (quoted text) from one native speaker a few weeks ago. Could someone explain me how it was meant to be, please? How do you understand it? I mean I don´t understand when I should use past simple in the Wimbledon 2005 sentence.
------
Here is my own context for using past perfect (hope it is okay)
" I remember playing at Wimbledon 2005 very well. I played some of my best tennis there and the crowd was amazing. That Wimbledon had been the best tournament in my career. I had never played a better tennis at any tournament until that magic one. Unfortunately I could not continue producing some of my best tennis in years to come after I broke my leg two month later and had to give up on my career of a professional player. "(I am telling this story in 2015) Am I right that past perfect wouldn´t be wrong in this sentence? I am using past perfect as I want to emphasize that W 05 had been a better tournament than any other which had been played until 2005.
-But I can not imagine a context for telling a similar story where past simple could be used. Could you help me to create one, please? In my opinion there always has to be some context behind it which would make past perfect a correct tense to use here.
Thank you very much!
When can I use the following two sentences? Wimbledon 2005 was the best torunament in my career./Wimbledon 2005 had been the best torunament in my career.
The past perfect is used to recount a past occurrence that was further back in the past than another (expressed or implicit) past occurrence. Wimbledon 2005 is a past event. Are you situating Wimbledon 2005 at a point earlier than another past event? If so, what's the other past event? I can't see one in that sentence. If there isn't one, then the past simple must be used: "Wimbledon 2005 was the best tournament in my career". - the past perfect would be wrong. I'll be very surprised if you can find a grammar book that says otherwise.
Now I did use the past perfect in my explanatory sentence: "Wimbledon 2005 was (at the time) the best tournament you had ever played in up to that moment." The past occurrence serving as the reference point is 'Wimbledon 2005' (it was, in 2005: past simple). The subordinate clause, "you had ever played in up to that moment", refers additionally to all the tournaments you had played in before 2005, so the past perfect is used: all those other tournaments had occurred earlier than Wimbledon 2005.
I got this answer (quoted text) from one native speaker a few weeks ago. Could someone explain me how it was meant to be, please? How do you understand it? I mean I don´t understand when I should use past simple in the Wimbledon 2005 sentence.
------
Here is my own context for using past perfect (hope it is okay)
" I remember playing at Wimbledon 2005 very well. I played some of my best tennis there and the crowd was amazing. That Wimbledon had been the best tournament in my career. I had never played a better tennis at any tournament until that magic one. Unfortunately I could not continue producing some of my best tennis in years to come after I broke my leg two month later and had to give up on my career of a professional player. "(I am telling this story in 2015) Am I right that past perfect wouldn´t be wrong in this sentence? I am using past perfect as I want to emphasize that W 05 had been a better tournament than any other which had been played until 2005.
-But I can not imagine a context for telling a similar story where past simple could be used. Could you help me to create one, please? In my opinion there always has to be some context behind it which would make past perfect a correct tense to use here.
Thank you very much!