cognitive hierarchies

Status
Not open for further replies.

svetlana14

Senior Member
Joined
Dec 5, 2013
Member Type
Interested in Language
Native Language
Ukrainian
Home Country
Ukraine
Current Location
Ukraine
Dear All,

In his article "The Pandemic and Political Order" Francis Fukuyama wrote last summer that "Another reason for pessimism is that the positive scenarios assume some sort of rational public discourse and social learning. Yet the link between technocratic expertise and public policy is weaker today than in the past, when elites held more power. The democratization of authority spurred by the digital revolution has flattened cognitive hierarchies along with other hierarchies, and political decision-making is now driven by often weaponized babble. That is hardly an ideal environment for constructive, collective self-examination, and some polities may remain irrational longer than they can remain solvent."

I am woundering what do you think the expression (term) "cognitive hierarchies" would mean in the context. My version is that it is a sort of technocratic government (technocrats), which "driven by their cognitive "problem-solution mindsets".

Thank you.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

GoesStation

No Longer With Us (RIP)
Joined
Dec 22, 2015
Member Type
Interested in Language
Native Language
American English
Home Country
United States
Current Location
United States
Doesn't Fukuyama explain the term earlier in the article?
 

svetlana14

Senior Member
Joined
Dec 5, 2013
Member Type
Interested in Language
Native Language
Ukrainian
Home Country
Ukraine
Current Location
Ukraine
Unfortunately, he didn't.
 

Charlie Bernstein

VIP Member
Joined
Jan 28, 2009
Member Type
Other
Native Language
English
Home Country
United States
Current Location
United States
Dear All,

In his article "The Pandemic and Political Order,
" Francis Fukuyama wrote last summer, "Another reason for pessimism is that the positive scenarios assume some sort of rational public discourse and social learning. Yet the link between technocratic expertise and public policy is weaker today than in the past, when elites held more power. The democratization of authority spurred by the digital revolution has flattened cognitive hierarchies along with other hierarchies, and political decision-making is now driven by often weaponized babble. That is hardly an ideal environment for constructive, collective self-examination, and some polities may remain irrational longer than they can remain solvent."

I wonder what [STRIKE]do[/STRIKE] you think the expression (term) "cognitive hierarchies" means
in the context.

He just means we're getting dumber. The writing is needlessly murky — an example of the very elitism he's complaining about.


My version is that it is a sort of technocratic government (technocrats), which are
[STRIKE]"[/STRIKE]driven by their cognitive [STRIKE]"[/STRIKE]problem-solving mindsets[STRIKE]"[/STRIKE].

If you're defining cognitive hierarchies, you're reading too much into the expression. If you're summarizing the entire passage, that's only a piece of it.


Thank you.
You're welcome!
 
Last edited by a moderator:

jutfrank

VIP Member
Joined
Mar 5, 2014
Member Type
English Teacher
Native Language
English
Home Country
England
Current Location
England
To put it very simply: If I know what you're thinking, and you know what I'm thinking, then we can together make more rational decisions as fellow members of a society.

The pessimistic picture he's putting forward is that public discourse has become (and the implication is that it will continue to become) less rational.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top