kadioguy
Key Member
- Joined
- Mar 4, 2017
- Member Type
- Student or Learner
- Native Language
- Chinese
- Home Country
- Taiwan
- Current Location
- Taiwan
[In the copyright page of Oxford Business English Dictionary for learners of English, the English-Chinese edition]
English text originally published as Oxford Business English Dictionary for learners of English by Oxford University Press, Great Clarendon Street, Oxford. © Oxford University Press 2005
This English-Chinese edition published in association with Huaxia Publishing House for distribution in Mainland China and by Oxford University Press for distribution elsewhere including Hong Kong, Macau and Taiwan. Copyright @ Oxford University Press 2010
-------
If I had to make them into complete sentences, should they be:
1. The English text was originally published as Oxford Business English Dictionary for learners of English ....
2. This English-Chinese edition is published in association with Huaxia Publishing House for distribution in Mainland China ....
I used "was originally published" in the first to indicate that the publication was in the past, while "is published" in the second to indicate that the association is valid at the time of publication.
Is that right?
English text originally published as Oxford Business English Dictionary for learners of English by Oxford University Press, Great Clarendon Street, Oxford. © Oxford University Press 2005
This English-Chinese edition published in association with Huaxia Publishing House for distribution in Mainland China and by Oxford University Press for distribution elsewhere including Hong Kong, Macau and Taiwan. Copyright @ Oxford University Press 2010
-------
If I had to make them into complete sentences, should they be:
1. The English text was originally published as Oxford Business English Dictionary for learners of English ....
2. This English-Chinese edition is published in association with Huaxia Publishing House for distribution in Mainland China ....
I used "was originally published" in the first to indicate that the publication was in the past, while "is published" in the second to indicate that the association is valid at the time of publication.
Is that right?
Last edited:
