I ain't got none left

[GoodTaste]

Here, "I ain't got none left" appears to mean the opposite - "I ain't got any left."

"None" is typically defined as "not any", yet the context defies the definition.

Doubt negative doesn't constitute positive here.

Does "none" mean "any" as non-standard English in this context?

===================
ain't
not standard
UK /eɪnt/ US /eɪnt/

short form of am not, is not, are not, has not, or have not:
He ain't going.
"Can I have a cigarette?" "I ain't got none left."

Source: Cambridge Dictionary
https://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/english/ain-t?q=ain’t+

 

[probus]

The meaning is crystal clear: I don't have any left. While many people consider ain't incorrect or at best substandard, the fact is that a good many native speakers of AmE use it. And an author might put your sentence into the mouth of a character in order to establish that the character is ill-educated or uncouth. In that case the double negative is just icing on the cake.

 

[tedmc]

I believe it is typical American colloquialism, especially prevalent among a segment of the people and is not meant for written English.

 

[GoodTaste]

It's common enough in BrE.

Do the speakers include well-educated people who say it casually or in order to produce a funny effect?

 

[tedmc]

Do the speakers include well-educated people who say it casually or in order to produce a funny effect?

It is meant to sound rough, uncouth and cheeky, and not serious.

 

[Skrej]

Do the speakers include well-educated people who say it casually or in order to produce a funny effect?

I'm sure some use it that way, probably in an attempt to mock or belittle others. There are also educated people using it just as a standard part of their dialect. Throughout the southern US in particular, use transcends educational and socioeconomic levels.

It is meant to sound rough, uncouth and cheeky, and not serious.

For many people, it's just a standard (read:serious) part of their dialect. Your comment is a perfect example of how its use is stigmatized as a marker of inferior class, status, register, or education.

 

[emsr2d2]

You can look at it as being a non-standard variant of either:
1. I haven't got any left.
2. I have none left.

 

[Tdol]

Do the speakers include well-educated people who say it casually or in order to produce a funny effect?

I use ain't in casual conversation, and not to be funny. I don't do the double negative, though.

 

[TheParser]

Do the speakers include well-educated people who say it casually or in order to produce a funny effect?

NOT A TEACHER

I believe that educated people occasionally use it for serious emphasis, too.


Mona: Economic conditions are very bad because of the pandemic.

Raul: I'm afraid we ain't seen nothing yet! ( = the economic situation is going to get ​even worse.)

 

[Charlie Bernstein]

Always keep in mind:

1. Most native English speakers have some bad grammar habits.

2. English is complicated because it's a collision of many languages. To many of the languages that have contributed to the language, double negatives are correct.

3. English changes, and it changes differently in different places. So there are variations. What evolves and sounds natural in one place isn't always acceptable in another place.