That move that could further harm the country’s science

[GoodTaste]

Following Russia’s invasion of Ukraine, many research organizations swiftly cut funding and collaboration ties with Russia. But the moves have sparked debate over whether Russian scientists should be able to publish in international journals. Some argue that a boycott is morally correct and could help end the war, but many journals say that indiscriminately isolating Russia’s scientists would do more harm than good. This week, Russian authorities seem to have responded to threats of a boycott by saying that it plans to drop a requirement that government-funded scientists publish in recognized foreign journals. That move that could further harm the country’s science, say some Russian researchers.
Source: Nature

Should the second “that” in the phrase “That move that could further harm the country’s science” be removed?

 

[Tarheel]

Yes. It's out of place. (And rather jarring.)

I think your question should be Is that word in there by mistake?