trip to Africa

Status
Not open for further replies.

Offroad

Key Member
Joined
Feb 9, 2008
Member Type
Interested in Language
Native Language
Brazilian Portuguese
Home Country
Brazil
Current Location
Brazil
Dear teachers...

Could you help me understand the difference, if any, between 'that' and 'which' in this sentence?

I arrived from a trip to Africa, __that/which_ provided me with all kinds of fresh evidence of the importance of politics.

I believe both work there.

Thanks.
 
The comma makes this a non-defining relative clause, in which only which is possible.

Without a comma, it becomes a non-defining clause, in which which can be, and often is, replaced by that with no change in meaning.

That can also replace who in defining relative clauses.

I had tea with the friend who/that worked with me in china.
I had tea with my friend, who[STRIKE] that[/STRIKE] worked with me in China.
 
Dear teachers...

Could you help me understand the difference, if any, between 'that' and 'which' in this sentence?

I arrived from a trip to Africa, __that/which_ provided me with all kinds of fresh evidence of the importance of politics.

I believe both work there.

Thanks.
I think you can use either, but I would use the past perfect there "had provided".
 
Oops I didn't notice the comma.:oops:
 
I think you can use either, but I would use the past perfect there "had provided".
I am not sure I follow:

I arrived from a trip to Africa that/which had provided me with all kinds of fresh evidence of the importance of politics.
I arrived from a trip to Africa that/which provided me with all kinds of fresh evidence of the importance of politics.

Thanks
 
1. I arrived from a trip to Africa that/which had provided me with all kinds of fresh evidence of the importance of politics.
2. I arrived from a trip to Africa that/which provided me with all kinds of fresh evidence of the importance of politics.
Bhaisahab would use a past perfect, as in #1, which makes it crystal clear that the trip providing fresh evidence took place before the arrival.

I think the context makes it clear, and that the past simple in #2 is sufficient.

I am still reasonably happy with my opinion, but if I now had to choose between the two versions, I would probably go for bhaisa's.
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top