Vaccine Safety in Pregnant Persons vs. Vaccine Safety in Pregnant Women

Status
Not open for further replies.

GoodTaste

Key Member
Joined
Feb 19, 2016
Member Type
Student or Learner
Native Language
Chinese
Home Country
China
Current Location
China
On Preliminary Findings of mRNA Covid-19 Vaccine Safety in Pregnant Persons

Source: New England Journal of Medicine

What is the difference between "Vaccine Safety in Pregnant Persons" and "Vaccine Safety in Pregnant Women"? Naturally, only women can be pregnant. Using "pregnant persons" rather than "pregnant women" sounds as if men can be pregnant too. Also, "pregnant persons" sounds a bit pedantic. I am not very sure.
 

probus

Moderator
Staff member
Joined
Jan 7, 2011
Member Type
Retired English Teacher
Native Language
English
Home Country
Canada
Current Location
Canada
Many people still believe that male or female is a simple dichotomy. In other words, they think that everybody is either one or the other. They are wrong -- the reality is much more complex than that. Some people are born with what is called in medical jargon ambiguous genitalia. Moreover, there is the whole question of what people feel or perceive about their gender. Some people feel they are neither, or partly one and partly the other, or sometimes one and sometimes the other.

As far as English is concerned the important thing is to keep our language neutral and inclusive. That is why the NEJM used persons.
 

5jj

Moderator
Staff member
Joined
Oct 14, 2010
Member Type
English Teacher
Native Language
British English
Home Country
Czech Republic
Current Location
Czech Republic

jutfrank

VIP Member
Joined
Mar 5, 2014
Member Type
English Teacher
Native Language
English
Home Country
England
Current Location
England
I really don't think the authors used the word persons in order to be inclusive. Besides, they use women in plenty of places in the text.

It's quite customary to use the word persons in such formal medical texts.
 

Tdol

No Longer With Us (RIP)
Staff member
Joined
Nov 13, 2002
Native Language
British English
Home Country
UK
Current Location
Japan
Also, "pregnant persons" sounds a bit pedantic. I am not very sure.

Some people recommend the usage, others condemn it. It has become one of those terms in the culture wars.
 

SoothingDave

VIP Member
Joined
Apr 17, 2009
Member Type
Interested in Language
Native Language
American English
Home Country
United States
Current Location
United States
I really don't think the authors used the word persons in order to be inclusive. Besides, they use women in plenty of places in the text.

It's quite customary to use the word persons in such formal medical texts.

No, they are definitely doing it to be "inclusive" and to show their superiority to the benighted fools who think only women get pregnant.
 

Skrej

VIP Member
Joined
May 11, 2015
Member Type
English Teacher
Native Language
English
Home Country
United States
Current Location
United States
They're not mothers nowadays anyway, because that's exclusionary. They're a "birthing person". :roll:
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top