The Age of Federalism: The Early American Republic, 1788-1800

BUY FROM AMAZON.COM
Price: $34.03

Usually ships in 24 hours

By: Stanley Elkins and Eric McKitrick
(19 customer reviews)
RRP: $39.95
Buy New: $34.03
You Save: $5.92 (15%)


Availability: Usually ships in 24 hours

EDITORIAL REVIEW

When Thomas Jefferson took the oath of office for the presidency in 1801, America had just passed through twelve critical years, years dominated by some of the towering figures of our history and by the challenge of having to do everything for the first time. Washington, Hamilton, Madison, Adams, and Jefferson himself each had a share in shaping that remarkable era--an era that is brilliantly captured in The Age of Federalism.

Written by esteemed historians Stanley Elkins and Eric McKitrick, The Age of Federalism gives us a reflective, deeply informed analytical survey of this extraordinary period. Ranging over the widest variety of concerns--political, cultural, economic, diplomatic, and military--the authors provide a sweeping historical account, keeping always in view not only the problems the new nation faced but also the particular individuals who tried to solve them. As they move through the Federalist era, they draw subtly perceptive character sketches not only of the great figures--Washington and Jefferson, Talleyrand and Napoleon Bonaparte--but also of lesser ones, such as George Hammond, Britain's frustrated minister to the United States, James McHenry, Adams's hapless Secretary of War, the pre-Chief Justice version of John Marshall, and others. They weave these lively profiles into an analysis of the central controversies of the day, turning such intricate issues as the public debt into fascinating depictions of opposing political strategies and contending economic philosophies. Each dispute bears in some way on the broader story of the emerging nation. The authors show, for instance, the consequences the fight over Hamilton's financial system had for the locating of the nation's permanent capital, and how it widened an ideological gulf between Hamilton and the Virginians, Madison and Jefferson, that became unbridgeable. The statesmen of the founding generation, the authors believe, did "a surprising number of things right." But Elkins and McKitrick also describe some things that went resoundingly wrong: the hopelessly underfinanced effort to construct a capital city on the Potomac (New York, they argue, would have been a far more logical choice than Washington), and prosecutions under the Alien and Sedition Acts which turned into a comic nightmare. No detail is left out, or left uninteresting, as their account continues through the Adams presidency, the XYZ affair, the naval Quasi-War with France, and the desperate Federalist maneuvers in 1800, first to prevent the reelection of Adams and then to nullify the election of Jefferson.

The Age of Federalism is the fruit of many years of discussion and thought, in which deep scholarship is matched only by the lucid distinction of its prose. With it, Stanley Elkins and Eric McKitrick have produced the definitive study, long awaited by historians, of the early national era.

PRODUCT DETAILS

Publisher: Oxford University Press, USA
Pub. Date: 23rd February 1995
Catalog: Book
Media: Paperback
Number Of Pages: 944
Ean: 9780195093810
Isbn: 019509381X

ABOUT THIS BOOK

USER REVIEWS

Big, but worth it.
~ Written on Sep 29, 2009. out of users found this review helpful.

This book may seem intimidating but it is far from. The author gives only the important details of Federalism in the Early American Republic and shows the struggles of early America and how we take what the founding fathers created for granted.

Spectacular Effort
~ Written on Sep 23, 2009. out of users found this review helpful.

" The Age of Federalism" is an in depth scholarly triumph, in so many regards. I do not hold, as has been offered by a few reviewers, that work is too long. I witnessed similar comments regarding Rakove's work "Original Meanings". The setting of the back drop, as well citing the conversations that occurred is necessary to a more complete comprehension of the time.
I had hoped seeing the size and scope of the work for a more unbiased examination of those who opposed the Federalists, the icons of that movement being Madison and Jefferson. In the quodlibet concerning the Bank Bill, the details of the debate are thorough to a point. Missing are the references made by Ames that by no 'fair' application would the Constitution have such powers. Even more striking is the Resolutions which 7 of the States had accompanying Ratification, all of which referenced the consent they had given the Constitution included no broad or latitudinous construction or interpretation of the national powers was comprehended by the ratifying Conventions. Hamilton's own state's, New York, Ratification Resolutions were categoric in this regard. The assuaging Bill of Rights Madison ushered through Congress, wrote the Ninth And Tenth Amendment as a response to these very concerns.
The debate regarding whether Hamilton was correct or Jefferson regarding the definition of the word necessary, as used in Article one section 8 is highlighted. The larger question is not whether Hamilton, or Jefferson and Madison were correct. The question rather is what did the Ratifying Conventions understand; and in the case of Hamilton's home State, New York apparently that was not the case. Pitting the initiates of the Constitution, say Madison against Hamilton is oddly miscast. Both Hamilton and Madison are icons, divergent in opinions yes, but still icons.
In the realm of secondary histories this work is excellent, considering its subject, the bias I am implying is certainly of an understandable and venial nature. Yet the quest for a work that accurately portrays the Federalist Era still awaits us.

A dense chewy read
~ Written on Sep 23, 2009. 1 out of 2 users found this review helpful.

I have had this book in my library since the early 90's when it was first published and have never gotten that far into it on the three or four times I have picked it up. I am just finishing the recent Hamilton bio from Chernow and wanted to try it again. I am about a couple of hundred pages into it, not quite to the French Revolution yet.

I don't think I qualify for debating the facts in the book (especially as I have yet to finish it all the way thru) But my point is as a fairly well read person with a history BA, the book can be challenging to read for pleasure.

I think a problem is that the authors write like academics, not that that is a bad thing but sometimes makes it hard to read when you are looking for a quick half hour or so while the wife is watching the Food Channel. I plead guilty as some of my course writings back in the 80's for undergrad history courses in this era are completely incomprehensible to me now, even on the ones I got 'B's on. Academese is a foreign language to outsiders.

One thing that I have found that has made this attempt at climbing Mt Federalism easier, is that I skipped the introduction and got to the meat of the actual history where the other books are not discussed (Wood, Bailyn etc) as I hated discussing those books in class.

Not a real good first read on the period, I would search out more 'popular history' writers before starting this book. One must crawl before running a marathon.

Recommended with some reservations.

Long Winded
~ Written on Jun 30, 2009. 1 out of 7 users found this review helpful.

Look, I have a Master's Degree in history and especially love reading about American history, but this book tries even my patience. I have never read a more mind numbing account of anything in my life. When I read this book, I begin to realize why so many of my friends and family hated history when they were in school. The chapters drone on and on and if the authors were making a point somewhere, the reader is half asleep by the time they get there. I would not recommend anyone waste their money on this book, but rather, look for shorter, more interesting books on the period.

History Writing at its Best
~ Written on Feb 10, 2009. out of users found this review helpful.

Elkins and McKitrick won the prestigious Bancroft Prize in 1994 for this outstanding work of scholarship that covers the initial period of American history during the administrations of Washington and Adams. This period is very important because the foundations of our government, politics, and foreign policy were laid at this time after the creation of the new and stronger federal government by the U.S. Constitution. The writers obviously did lots of research into original source documents. But they also are obviously well informed about what past historians have written about this period; one of the many merits of this book is that they share the interpretations of other historians rather than just giving their own. However, they do this in a very civil way; while they might disagree with the judgments of other historians, they never attack them. The book has very extensive endnotes, so readers who want to check out the views of other historians (or source documents) can easily do so.

The book is very well written and very insightful. Every page has interesting details about the events that occurred, the people involved, and insights about their meanings and ramifications. I found it both very educational, but also very enjoyable to read. Given the importance of the period, I suggest this should be on any Top 10 list of American History books.

SIMILAR ITEMS:

Search:
International
UK US
Browse Categories