International
Browse Categories
|
Making it Explicit: Reasoning, Representing, and Discursive CommitmentBUY FROM AMAZON.COM
Price: $27.62
Usually ships in 24 hours RRP: Buy New: $27.62 You Save: $5.88 (18%) Availability: Usually ships in 24 hours EDITORIAL REVIEWWhat would something unlike us--a chimpanzee, say, or a computer--have to be able to do to qualify as a possible knower, like us? To answer this question at the very heart of our sense of ourselves, philosophers have long focused on intentionality and have looked to language as a key to this condition. Making It Explicit is an investigation into the nature of language--the social practices that distinguish us as rational, logical creatures--that revises the very terms of this inquiry. Where accounts of the relation between language and mind have traditionally rested on the concept of representation, this book sets out an alternate approach based on inference, and on a conception of certain kinds of implicit assessment that become explicit in language. Making It Explicit is the first attempt to work out in detail a theory that renders linguistic meaning in terms of use--in short, to explain how semantic content can be conferred on expressions and attitudes that are suitably caught up in social practices. At the center of this enterprise is a notion of discursive commitment. Being able to talk--and so in the fullest sense being able to think--is a matter of mastering the practices that govern such commitments, being able to keep track of one's own commitments and those of others. Assessing the pragmatic significance of speech acts is a matter of explaining the explicit in terms of the implicit. As he traces the inferential structure of the social practices within which things can be made conceptually explicit, the author defines the distinctively expressive role of logical vocabulary. This expressive account of language, mind, and logic is, finally, an account of who we are. PRODUCT DETAILSPublisher: Harvard University PressPub. Date: 1st November 1998 Catalog: Book Media: Paperback Number Of Pages: 768 Ean: 9780674543300 Isbn: 0674543300 ABOUT THIS BOOKUSER REVIEWS
This books trys to fulfill very worthy philosophical ambitions - drawing attention to the philosophical importance of explicating the obvious. However the two systemic failings of the text are that (a) it is too wordy, and (b) attempts to address too many topics in detail. Both of these qualities should have been trapped during the editorial process. I confess that I am partial to the author's mission. Unfortunately, the grammatical style of much of the writing is egregiously wordy - even by philosophical standards. The result is that large tracts in the book are uninspiring and require such careful stalking of clauses as to deprive the reader of rewarding intelligibility. The second failing arises from the range of topics covered - simply immense - with no thematic core pulling them into a coherent theory. The book wanders with its topics. I spent too long going through this book not to find something of value in it, but what is there (on commitment, etc.) could be stated succinctly in a much smaller text. The time I gave to the text would have been more profitably spent on looking back over Hacker and Baker's works on Wittgenstein.
Having plowed through several hundred pages of this book, I simply concluded that there was nothing here that had not already been pointed out by Wittgenstein, Frege, Sellars, Quine, etc.--the very philosophers who are referenced constantly but never coherently brought together or successfully reframed into Brandom's project. In short, a lot of rhetorical hot air, badly in need of editing. In hope, I tried Brandom's slimmer explication of inferentialism, and again was profoundly disappointed. There's no there there.
It's now over 1 1/2 years since I first read "Making It Explicit" and Brandom's theory has not ever proven to be useful for me. Except for Brandom's short (which means, by the standards of this book, several pages) remarks about "canonical designators" (which are somewhat nifty, but quite independent from his overall theory; which may be the reason...), not once did Brandom's work ever help me solve any philosophical problems. Needless to say that Brandom's semantics for logic never ever helped solve any problems in formal logic. Considering the tedious reading, the ridiculously low given-information/rhetoric ratio in 750 pages, and the lack of fruitfulness, I can now say, that "Making It Explicit" was one of the worst philosophical books I have read.
Brandom deals with a number of outstanding problems in philosphy of language, epistemology, and philosophy of mind as these came to be construed by several generations of analytic philosophy beginning with Frege and continuing through Quine, Davidson, and Dummett. His solutions fall out of a Sellarsian theory grounded in the idea that meaning, inference, and epistemic justification are grounded in norms governing social interactions and practices. Brandom's treatment of standard questions of reference which have plagued us since Russell are particularly original and ingenious. Like the rest of his themes, this account is developed in detail with admirable rigor and honesty. Difficult but indespensible reading.
Finally, a book has come along which discusses Wilfrid Sellars philosophy which is even more difficult to read than Sellars himself. Brandom writes like a medieval scholastic footnoting and expanding the ideas envisioned by Wilfrid Sellars and conflated by Richard Rorty. Still, if one has the patience to make through this sometimes tedious 750 page book, one will be greatly rewarded. SIMILAR ITEMS: |

Too many words addressing too many topics
Of no use
Culminates a venerable analytic philosophical tradition.