Elements of Writing Fiction - Characters & Viewpoint (Elements of Fiction Writing)

Buying anything online you want 2 things, an accurate description and for it to arrive when they say it will. Both of those things were met from this seller 100%. I couldn't be happier.

I have written a non-fiction book, but never attempted fiction. This book gave me some good, solid information on character development and voice.

I originally picked up this book because Chris Paolini recommended it during his presentation at Comic-Con 2003 (and because I think Ender's Game is nothing short of genius). I just finished reading it, and I have to say it's a good one for any writer's toolbox. Orson Scott Card walks you through everything from what "makes" a character, to how characters change through the course of a novel, to the various point-of-view choices you have when telling a story.

Honestly, I think characterization is one of the hardest things about writing. For me the plot is something that usually either works or doesn't; it's fairly black or white. But characters lead me into that gray area where I'm never quite confident if other people are going to find them as interesting as I do. This book presents a lot of good questions to consider for your characters, and Orson Scott Card isn't afraid to break some of those writer's rules you hear such as "show don't tell" (he explains the benefits of each) or that there is actually any such thing as a standard for "good characterization" (the optimal depth of your characters depends on the type of story you are trying to tell).

Good stuff.

The book, though it did arrive a bit later than I would have liked, arrived in excellent condition. Thank you.

I have this book and the Nancy Kress book on Characters, Emotion & Viewpoint. I decided to read Card's book first and to be honest, I didn't expect too much. I have read many "1-2-3, by-the-numbers" texts on the craft of writing so I was hoping for a more in-depth approach to some of the most vital elements in writing a good story, but perhaps I have become jaded by the many author's subjective opinions that have been presumably set in stone.

Mr. Card's book was something different, and I found it very seminal in its effect on me, and not just something that confirmed what I already knew or thought I knew. Every chapter gave me considerations and perspectives that had somehow eluded me and I was able to rush to my computer and make changes in a novel I've been working on and realize that I may never get published, since I am a senior who has no patience for playing the publishing game; I just love to read, and now find I want to tell a story that is set in the near future. Well, whether published or not, I want my story to satisfy me, and that is where this book has been very helpful. Many reviews of this book have already described it in detail, so I will just confine myself to my own impressions of the book.

Buy it. It's pleasant to read and full of good suggestions. I don't see how you can go wrong, especially in his chapters on character development and related considerations. I think all writer-wannabes and curious readers will consider this book a worthwhile addition to their personal "writing" book-shelves. I don't think the advice is dated in any way. However, the book is rather meager in its treatment of POV, but still instructive. And I can see what people mean when they mention the author's apparent fixation with movies. But I think that may have been deliberate. Many Americans don't have an extensive background in literature, but most of us are lovers of good movies. Thus, the constant reference to movie stories might be more helpful for many would-be writers, especially young ones, who might miss the point if the author continually used classical short-stories and novels as a reference. Granted, if we want to write, we should be familiar with what's written, but let's face it, there are so many books in our cultural background that it would be difficult to know them all. At least I'll give the author of this book the benefit of a doubt regarding his constant movie references. Pete and Nora? Didn't bother me. If he used two different names every time he gave an example, it might tend to be confusing.