Et tu, Brute? ;-)
No one's denying you anything.
When I first wrote:
All the forms are fine, but in writing and in spoken language, when you want to sound a bit more polite, the first forms are better.
this is what I got concerning the forms in question and politeness:
There is no relationship to politeness. [...]As far as order, the speaker is usually listed last.
Yes, it is polite to list yourself last.
Two native speakers, at least one (I'm saying 'at least' because
allenman seemed to point something out about order at the end of his post, which, to me, was quite the same what I meant), confirmed that what I first wrote was valid as for politeness.
SoothingDave conceded to you the point about politeness. But it's invalid if you're comparing "Me and Mike" to "I and Mike" because they both put the speaker first, so should be equally impolite.
I never said that
Me and Mike or
I and Mike were impolite - all I said in that respect was that
Mike and me and
Mike and I were
a bit more polite, which, in my humble opinion, makes the difference.
"I and Mike" is less common than "Me and Mike" despite being grammatically correct and of equal politeness.
:up: You already know my opinion about such forms.
Besides "I and Mike" would be pronounced "Iron Mike" (as in Tyson) where I come from.
That is an absolutely invalid argument in this discussion, and I reckon, in many others.
Incidentally, when I initially saw:
1. You and I or Me and You
2. Roy and I or Me and Roy
the first thing that came to my mind was this - since the asker writes
you and
me with a capital letter, then s/he must be concerned about the forms in the
nominative case. That's why in my very first post in this thread I didn't mentioned anything about the differences
allenman and
SoothingDave wrote about afterwards.