difference between learned and learnt?

Status
Not open for further replies.
Ostap77 is correct. In AmE learned is both the simple past and the past participle of learn. While learnt is a proper alternative for the past participle, we rarely hear it spoken.
 
:up: Also (in Br English at least) 'learned' can be used as a two-syllable adjective that means 'educated' - 'a learnéd person' (the second syllable often has a written accent).

b
 
:up: Also (in Br English at least) 'learned' can be used as a two-syllable adjective that means 'educated' - 'a learnéd person' (the second syllable often has a written accent).

b
Yes. That pronunciation for the adjective is the same in the U.S. We had, during the second half of the 20th century, a famous and scholarly appeals court judge named Learned Hand.
I´ve never seen the written accent in AmE though.
 
hmmm.... thx for the answers. But what is AmE? Is it American spelling? So in summary...learned = American, learnt = British?
 
hmmm.... thx for the answers. But what is AmE? Is it American spelling? So in summary...learned = American, learnt = British?

AmE is American English - not just American spelling; also American syntax, American lexis and American phonology.

Your summary is an over-simplification that many people believe. As a British person who uses both 'learnt' and 'learned' I disagree. People have written something closer to the whole story in the foregoing posts. :)

b
 
We say learnt here.
 
I have always understood that there is a subtle difference:

"learned" is the past of the action of learning (e.g. Fred learned how to ride a bike)
"learnt" is the state that something (rather than someone) has been learned e.g. Mathematics was learnt.

The example with burned and burnt may be easier to explain:

The paper burned (i.e. it was on fire)
That piece of paper is burnt (i.e. the action of it being burned has caused it to be in a burnt state).

Happy to be told otherwise
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top