negative inversion

Status
Not open for further replies.

ostap77

Key Member
Joined
Sep 9, 2010
Member Type
Student or Learner
Native Language
Ukrainian
Home Country
Ukraine
Current Location
Ukraine
I'm writing a report on the American diet. So would be this sentence correct?

"There are a lot of foods that are of (the) American origin. Not only did Italy have no tomatoes,( but) Switzerland and Spain had no vanilla, chocolate or bell peppers before America was discovered by Europeans." Is it OK with the inversion?
 
Last edited:

Barb_D

Moderator
Staff member
Joined
Mar 12, 2007
Member Type
Other
Native Language
American English
Home Country
United States
Current Location
United States
I'm writing a report on the American diet. So would be this sentence correct?

"There are a lot of foods that are of the American origin. Not only did Italy have no tomatos, there were Switzerland and Spain that had no vanilla, chocolate or bell peppers before America was discovered by Europians." Is it OK with the inversion?

No, the inversion is not correct.
, there was no vanilla, chocolate or bell peppers in Switzerland and Spain.
, Switzerland and Spain had no vanilla, chocolate or bell peppers.
 

5jj

Moderator
Staff member
Joined
Oct 14, 2010
Member Type
English Teacher
Native Language
British English
Home Country
Czech Republic
Current Location
Czech Republic
No, the inversion is not correct.
, there was no vanilla, chocolate or bell peppers in Switzerland and Spain.
, Switzerland and Spain had no vanilla, chocolate or bell peppers.

Surely the inversion in Not only did Italy have no tomatoes is correct?
 

bhaisahab

Moderator
Staff member
Joined
Apr 12, 2008
Member Type
Retired English Teacher
Native Language
British English
Home Country
England
Current Location
Ireland
I think the inversion is OK but there are other problems, "Not only did Italy have no tomatoes, Switzerland and Spain had no vanilla, chocolate or bell peppers before America was discovered by Europeans." This is OK IMO.
 

5jj

Moderator
Staff member
Joined
Oct 14, 2010
Member Type
English Teacher
Native Language
British English
Home Country
Czech Republic
Current Location
Czech Republic
"Not only did Italy have no tomatoes, Switzerland and Spain had no vanilla, chocolate or bell peppers before America was discovered by Europeans." This is OK IMO.

This may well be a very personal thing, but for me it would sound more natural if we had but before Switzerland.
 

Barb_D

Moderator
Staff member
Joined
Mar 12, 2007
Member Type
Other
Native Language
American English
Home Country
United States
Current Location
United States
I didn't check spelling. :oops:
 

tipu s

Junior Member
Joined
Oct 21, 2010
Member Type
Student or Learner
Native Language
Urdu
Home Country
Pakistan
Current Location
Pakistan
This may well be a very personal thing, but for me it would sound more natural if we had but before Switzerland.
Only "but" OR "but Switzerland and Spain also had......" ??
 

Dood.

Member
Joined
Sep 18, 2010
Member Type
Student or Learner
Native Language
French
Home Country
France
Current Location
Wales
I thought that a "...but," was imply, when beginning a sentence with "Not only".
As fivejedjon suggested it.
And what if you add "...but Switzerland and Spain had no vanilla, chocolate or bell peppers either, before America was discovered by Europeans." Meaning that they didn't have any of these things.
Does it sound correct ?

Dood.
-----
Not a teacher's opinion
 

ostap77

Key Member
Joined
Sep 9, 2010
Member Type
Student or Learner
Native Language
Ukrainian
Home Country
Ukraine
Current Location
Ukraine
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top