Emphasize my contribution to the company

Status
Not open for further replies.

ardmore

Junior Member
Joined
Sep 16, 2010
Member Type
Interested in Language
Native Language
Chinese
Home Country
China
Current Location
United States
Hello,
I want to emphasize my contribution to the company in my resume. Basically I particated the programming for a company and because of it the software go to production. The company successfully went to market. The original statements sre:
Code:
Worked with VB6/VB.NET and MS SQL Server to develop Point of Sale product for aaa stores. aaa stores operate as a division of Burnaby-based bbb Canada Ltd., a wholly-owned subsidiary of bbb Co., Inc. (NYSE:ccc);
How to correct it?
 
The most important thing you did was develop a point-of-sale product, not what code you used, and I"m not sure that the fact that it's a wholly owned subidiary is impoartant at all.

Developed a Point-of-Sale product for AAA, meeting strict deadline requirements to allow this new division of BBB to go to market, using VB6/VB.NET and MS SQL
 
The most important thing you did was develop a point-of-sale product, not what code you used, and I"m not sure that the fact that it's a wholly owned subsidiary is important at all.
Sorry if I am wrong.
I am confused with "develop" usage in this sentence.
Is it a mistake?
I think it must be "development" or "was to".
Please correct me if I am wrong?
Thanks!
 
Last edited:
You can say "was develop" or "was to develop" or "was the development of" -- but the last form is wordier than necessary.
 
'Please correct me if I am wrong?'

That is a request and doesn't need a question mark.

Rover​
 
You can say "was develop" or "was to develop" or "was the development of" -- but the last form is wordier than necessary.
Thanks for help!
But I am still confused with "was develop". I always think that after "to be" we have to use a adjective or a noun.
Could you help me clarify it?
 
Barb said

'The most important thing you did was develop a point-of-sale product',

which is fine.

Rover
 
Barb said

'The most important thing you did was develop a point-of-sale product',

which is fine.

Rover

And as Barb explained shortly afterwards, that could be worded "The most important thing you did was to develop a point-of-sale product".

The rule that "to be must be followed by an adjective or a noun" is not correct. There are many places where forms of "to be" might be followed by a bare infinitive or a full infinitive.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top