fahad_a11
Member
- Joined
- Aug 25, 2015
- Member Type
- Student or Learner
- Native Language
- Urdu
- Home Country
- Pakistan
- Current Location
- Saudi Arabia
The world is consuming natural resources faster than they can be renewed. Therefore, it is important that products are made to last. Governments should discourage people from constantly buying up-to-date or fashionable products.
To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.
You should write at least 250 words.
In today’s world exploitation and exploration of natural resources, at its peak for the sake of personal benefit. This is an alarming situation and there is dire need of taking precautionary measures. Despite of this, I did not agree to some extent to limit the use of modern products and encourage companies to make long lasting products. By doing so, we are compromising safety issues and depriving people to take benefits from modern and advance technology.
There is no doubt that modern products are designed in accordance to latest technology and safety measures. For instance, todays car are much better in performance and more secure than older cars, as new car have state of the art features such as air bag, camera and internet connectivity etc. Those functions make car more reliable and durable and comfortable for its users. Additionally, being as a part of modern and diverse world, one should be equipped with modern products to create ease and comfort in their life.
Durable and long lasting products will create discrimination among people, as such products require huge amount for its development and would not be in reach of poor people. Moreover, this will have negative impact on new and inexperienced companies to develop kind of products that demand enormous funds and time. Thus, it will cause unemployment as not too many businesses would able to bear huge expenses.
To sum up, I would like to say that government should come up with pragmatic approach to devise alternative to natural resources than confiding people not to use latest and modern products.
To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.
You should write at least 250 words.
In today’s world exploitation and exploration of natural resources, at its peak for the sake of personal benefit. This is an alarming situation and there is dire need of taking precautionary measures. Despite of this, I did not agree to some extent to limit the use of modern products and encourage companies to make long lasting products. By doing so, we are compromising safety issues and depriving people to take benefits from modern and advance technology.
There is no doubt that modern products are designed in accordance to latest technology and safety measures. For instance, todays car are much better in performance and more secure than older cars, as new car have state of the art features such as air bag, camera and internet connectivity etc. Those functions make car more reliable and durable and comfortable for its users. Additionally, being as a part of modern and diverse world, one should be equipped with modern products to create ease and comfort in their life.
Durable and long lasting products will create discrimination among people, as such products require huge amount for its development and would not be in reach of poor people. Moreover, this will have negative impact on new and inexperienced companies to develop kind of products that demand enormous funds and time. Thus, it will cause unemployment as not too many businesses would able to bear huge expenses.
To sum up, I would like to say that government should come up with pragmatic approach to devise alternative to natural resources than confiding people not to use latest and modern products.
