Didn't have to/didn't need to

Status
Not open for further replies.

Rachel Adams

Key Member
Joined
Nov 4, 2018
Member Type
Student or Learner
Native Language
Russian
Home Country
Georgia
Current Location
Georgia
These sentences are from "English Grammar in Context" by Michael Vince. The book explains if something wasn't necessary "didn't need to" is used and for obligation "had to" or "didn't have to". But would it be wrong to say that "didn't have to" can be used in the second sentence and "didn't need to" in the first if it depends on what the speaker wants to express?

1. "Of course, in ancient times athletes didn't have to take drug tests."

2. "In ancient Greece, winning athletes didn't need to work again."
 

emsr2d2

Moderator
Staff member
Joined
Jul 28, 2009
Member Type
English Teacher
Native Language
British English
Home Country
UK
Current Location
UK
"need to" wouldn't work in sentence 1. No one "needs" to take a drug test - it's an obligation if you're a professional athlete. It's something you have to do.
"have to" wouldn't work in sentence 2. No one has to work. It's optional. As it stands, the sentence makes it clear that athletes had no need to work. Whether this is because they won a lot of money or because, as champions, they were given everything they needed to live isn't clear.
 

Rachel Adams

Key Member
Joined
Nov 4, 2018
Member Type
Student or Learner
Native Language
Russian
Home Country
Georgia
Current Location
Georgia
"need to" wouldn't work in sentence 1. No one "needs" to take a drug test - it's an obligation if you're a professional athlete. It's something you have to do.
"have to" wouldn't work in sentence 2. No one has to work. It's optional. As it stands, the sentence makes it clear that athletes had no need to work. Whether this is because they won a lot of money or because, as champions, they were given everything they needed to live isn't clear.

I meant "didn't need to" in 1 and "didn't have to in 2.
1. "Of course, in ancient times athletes didn't need to take drug tests."

2. "In ancient Greece, winning athletes didn't have to work again."
 

emsr2d2

Moderator
Staff member
Joined
Jul 28, 2009
Member Type
English Teacher
Native Language
British English
Home Country
UK
Current Location
UK
I knew exactly what you meant. I just didn't bother writing "didn't" each time.
 

Rachel Adams

Key Member
Joined
Nov 4, 2018
Member Type
Student or Learner
Native Language
Russian
Home Country
Georgia
Current Location
Georgia
I knew exactly what you meant. I just didn't bother writing "didn't" each time.

Would it be wrong to say that when something was done but it wasn't necessary only "needn't have done" is used? But it is not used for an action that wasn't done. For example, "I needn't have bought another loaf of bread. We already had one." (I bought it). If I didn't buy a loaf of bread or even if I bought it but it wasn't necessary I can use either "I didn't need to" and " didn't have to". Am I right?
I also used explanations in this thread.
https://www.usingenglish.com/forum/threads/149784-Needn-t-have-done-Didn-t-have-to-Didn-t-need-to
Post #4.
And this one:
https://www.bbc.co.uk/worldservice/learningenglish/grammar/learnit/learnitv317.shtml
 

Yankee

Banned
Joined
Sep 13, 2013
Member Type
Retired English Teacher
Native Language
English
Home Country
United States
Current Location
United States
Would it be wrong to say that when something was done but it wasn't necessary only "needn't have done" is used? But it is not used for an action that wasn't done. For example, "I needn't have bought another loaf of bread. We already had one." (I bought it). If I didn't buy a loaf of bread or even if I bought it but it wasn't necessary I can use either "I didn't need to" and " didn't have to". Am I right?
I also used explanations in this thread.
https://www.usingenglish.com/forum/threads/149784-Needn-t-have-done-Didn-t-have-to-Didn-t-need-to
Post #4.
And this one:
https://www.bbc.co.uk/worldservice/learningenglish/grammar/learnit/learnitv317.shtml

Bread was purchased by "A", and "B" said,"I bought bread yesterday. You didn't have to have bought some today."/ "You didn't need to have bought some today." OR, bread was purchased by "B" only (B to A), "I bought bread yesterday. You don't need to buy some today./You don't have to buy some today."

My shot.
 

5jj

Moderator
Staff member
Joined
Oct 14, 2010
Member Type
English Teacher
Native Language
British English
Home Country
Czech Republic
Current Location
Czech Republic
"I bought bread yesterday. You didn't have to have bought some today."/ "You didn't need to have bought some today."
They both sound very unnatural to me.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Yankee

Banned
Joined
Sep 13, 2013
Member Type
Retired English Teacher
Native Language
English
Home Country
United States
Current Location
United States
They both sound very unnatural to me.

Perhaps not in everyone's day-to-day, usage but not ungrammatical. Given a choice I would tend to use the form with "...didn't need to have.....".
 

emsr2d2

Moderator
Staff member
Joined
Jul 28, 2009
Member Type
English Teacher
Native Language
British English
Home Country
UK
Current Location
UK
If the person (unnecessarily) bought bread today, use "I bought bread yesterday. You didn't need to buy it today".
If the person is considering buying bread later today, use "I bought bread yesterday. You don't need to buy it today".
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top