a person vs. one person

Status
Not open for further replies.

sb70012

Senior Member
Joined
Jun 19, 2013
Member Type
Interested in Language
Native Language
Persian
Home Country
Iran
Current Location
Iran
1. Luckily, only a person was injured. = (incorrect)
2. Luckily, only one person was injured. = (correct)

Source: ABC of Common Grammatical Errors by
Nigel D Turton. Part 3 , a/an Use


Hello teachers,

As you know when we need to emphasize “how many”, we can use one. See:
Luckily, only one saucer was broken. (not two, three, etc) = Correct
Luckily, only a saucer was broken. (not a cup, plate, etc) = Correct
If so, then why number 1 is incorrect? If (a saucer) is correct then why (a person) doesn’t fit in number 1?


Many thanks in advance.

***************************************

One English told me:

Your book is wrong because:

'Luckily, only a person was injured in the accident (no animals were harmed).' = can be correct too


But what's your opinion?

Thank you.​
 
Before replying to this, Using English teachers, please read this first. Only partial context has been given here.

I did not say the book was wrong, and sb knows that.

Rover
 
Last edited:
1. Luckily, only a person was injured. = (incorrect)
2. Luckily, only one person was injured. = (correct)

Source: ABC of Common Grammatical Errors by
Nigel D Turton. Part 3 , a/an Use


Hello teachers,

As you know when we need to emphasize “how many”, we can use one. See:
Luckily, only one saucer was broken. (not two, three, etc) = Correct
Luckily, only a saucer was broken. (not a cup, plate, etc) = Correct
If so, then why number 1 is incorrect? If (a saucer) is correct then why (a person) doesn’t fit in number 1?


Many thanks in advance.

***************************************

One English told me:

Your book is wrong because:

'Luckily, only a person was injured in the accident (no animals were harmed).' = can be correct too


But what's your opinion?

Thank you.​

There was nothing at all wrong with Rover's explanation of the grammar. The difficulty with your first sentence is that we really wouldn't consider an injury to a person (as opposed to an animal, a tree, etc) to be lucky. If you change the species, it works just fine.

There was an accident on the highway. The car was totaled, but luckily only a deer was injured.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Ask a Teacher

If you have a question about the English language and would like to ask one of our many English teachers and language experts, please click the button below to let us know:

(Requires Registration)
Back
Top