[Grammar] Adjectives and nouns in compound phrases

Status
Not open for further replies.

atabitaraf

Key Member
Joined
May 19, 2010
Member Type
Student or Learner
Native Language
Persian
Home Country
Iran
Current Location
Iran
Can we say that in compound phrases like 'gold watch' and 'golden watch' whenever we use the noun it refers to the material used. But whenever we use the adjective it refers to the color, covering, or any outer view and not the material?
- a gold watch and the golden watch
- a mud wall and a muddy wall
 
Yes, you're right.
A gold watch is made of gold.
A mud wall is made of mud.

Something that is "golden" is gold in color. Something that is "muddy" has mud on it. You will have to use some real-world knowledge to figure out whether it's the color, the appearance, the covering, etc.

And sometimes you have to have real-world knowledge about the first, too. If I say I wore a "gold dress" to a formal party, you can be pretty sure my dress wasn't made of threads spun from gold. Although, if I were a celebrity or some rich princess, you might not be sure either way!
 
And when it's important to distinguish, we can use things like gold-coloured.
 
Yes, you're right.
A gold watch is made of gold.
A mud wall is made of mud.

Something that is "golden" is gold in color. Something that is "muddy" has mud on it. You will have to use some real-world knowledge to figure out whether it's the color, the appearance, the covering, etc.

And sometimes you have to have real-world knowledge about the first, too. If I say I wore a "gold dress" to a formal party, you can be pretty sure my dress wasn't made of threads spun from gold. Although, if I were a celebrity or some rich princess, you might not be sure either way!

What about 'electric teacher,' 'electricity teacher' and 'electrical teacher'
What are the differences in meaning?
 
The only one of those that makes sense to me is "electricity teacher" -- a teacher who teaches on the subject of electricity. This is the same as "French teacher" being a teacher who teaches French, not a teacher who IS French (in mosts contexts).

I can't imagine what the others mean.
 
The only one of those that makes sense to me is "electricity teacher" -- a teacher who teaches on the subject of electricity. This is the same as "French teacher" being a teacher who teaches French, not a teacher who IS French (in mosts contexts).

I can't imagine what the others mean.
So the rule is not correct.
'gold coin' is a coin made of gold.
'mud wall' is a wall made of mud.
But 'electricity teacher' is not a teacher made of electricity.
 
As I said (twice) you need to apply real-world knowledge.

The "rule" applies when you're talking about a substance that could logically be the material the noun could be constructed of.

The ice cream man sells ice cream; he is not made of ice cream. An ice-cream cake is a dessert made from ice cream.
 
As I said (twice) you need to apply real-world knowledge.

The "rule" applies when you're talking about a substance that could logically be the material the noun could be constructed of.

The ice cream man sells ice cream; he is not made of ice cream. An ice-cream cake is a dessert made from ice cream.

Pardon me. Because I know you answer student's questions so precisely I wondered why you didn't use hypen for 'ice cream man' but you used hyphen for 'ice-cream cake'. That may be for being adjective or noun too?
If I ask too much please tell me to stop. It was the last one any way.
Thank you so much teacher.
ata
 
Pardon me. Because I know you answer student's questions so precisely I wondered why you didn't use a hypHen for 'ice cream man' but you used a hyphen [or just 'you used one for...'] for 'ice-cream cake'. [STRIKE]That may[/STRIKE] Could that be f[STRIKE]or being[/STRIKE] because it's an adjective in one case and a noun in the other[STRIKE]or noun too[/STRIKE]?
If I ask too much please tell me to stop. It was the last one anyway [one word].
Thank you so much teacher.
ata
Barb has already mentioned real-world knowledge. Her real world isn't mine (US/UK) and in my world 'ice cream cakes' don't exist! So I don't know what ones's made of; ice cream, I guess, though I don't know how that would work. ;-)

But for me an 'ice cream man' has no hyphen specifically because the man isn't made of ice cream (whereas a 'gingerbread man' is made of gingerbread {it's not a man though :-?:) - but you know that, because of real-world knowledge}).

b
 
Last edited:
I really want there to be an ice cream man actually made of ice cream!

And for BobK, this is an ice cream cake!
 
At some county or state fairs, they make sculptures out of butter. And we know they make sculpture out of ice. So, I guess you can have a man sculpted out of ice cream. But that is certainly not the normal meaning.
 
I'll have to clear that image out of my browsing history; laptop's putting on weight. ;-)

b
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top