aim at or aim for

Status
Not open for further replies.

faab267

Member
Joined
Jul 22, 2020
Member Type
Student or Learner
Native Language
French
Home Country
Belgium
Current Location
Brazil
Are both sentences correct?

The sniper was aiming at the fugitive's legs.

The sniper was aiming for the fugitive's legs.
 
Welcome to the forum, faab267.

Yes.
 
The second suggests that there was purpose- the sniper is likely to have fired and missed.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Ask a Teacher

If you have a question about the English language and would like to ask one of our many English teachers and language experts, please click the button below to let us know:

(Requires Registration)
Back
Top