always will

Status
Not open for further replies.

aysaa

Senior Member
Joined
Nov 26, 2011
Member Type
Student or Learner
Native Language
Turkish
Home Country
Turkey
Current Location
Turkey
Hi,

-These shoes are cheap, and always will be.

-These shoes are cheap, and will always be.

Can you please tell me the position of 'always' is possible in these senteces?

Thanks.
 
Last edited:

Mr_Ben

Member
Joined
Oct 14, 2010
Member Type
English Teacher
Native Language
American English
Home Country
United States
Current Location
Switzerland
Hi,

-These shoes are cheap, and always will be. This is correct.

-These shoes are cheap, and will always be cheap. Now this is correct, too.

Can you please tell me the position of 'always' is possible in these senteces?

Thanks.

Sorry for the long wait, I've been watching this thread since last night. I knew how to make the correct sentences but I can't explain exactly why and I was hoping another teacher would do it. ;-) Hopefully someone will come along and check my work.

There's an inversion that happens in these tags at the end of a sentence: "I do something and so does he." The first clause is subject + verb and the second clause is verb + subject. And so it feels like (this means I haven't looked this up so I may be wrong) this inversion is the reason the adverb is in a different position. In your second sentence, once you have an object the word order is regular again.
 

5jj

Moderator
Staff member
Joined
Oct 14, 2010
Member Type
Retired English Teacher
Native Language
British English
Home Country
Czech Republic
Current Location
Czech Republic
There is no inversion in either sentence.

-These shoes are cheap, and (they) always will be.

-These shoes are cheap, and (they) will always be
.

Like Mr_Ben, I have been trying to think of an explanation for why the first sounds more natural, but I haven't come up with one yet. The second is not incorrect but, as Mr B suggested, it is more natural with the adjective following.
 

Mr_Ben

Member
Joined
Oct 14, 2010
Member Type
English Teacher
Native Language
American English
Home Country
United States
Current Location
Switzerland
There is no inversion in either sentence.

:oops: I knew I'd get something wrong.

I'm trying to figure out where to look for this. I'm looking through Grammar for English Language Teachers by Martin Parrot; ellipsis seems like the right track but there's nothing about the position of adverbs of frequency.

A related question (for me) is, why would aysaa's sentences be incorrect without "be"? We can't say "These shoes are cheap, and they always will." But Elvis can sing, "Oh my darling, I love you, and I always will." :-?
 

5jj

Moderator
Staff member
Joined
Oct 14, 2010
Member Type
Retired English Teacher
Native Language
British English
Home Country
Czech Republic
Current Location
Czech Republic
We can't say "These shoes are cheap, and they always will." But Elvis can sing, "Oh my darling, I love you, and I always will." :-?
It's because we do not use auxiliaries with BE.

I love gin and so does my wife.
I am drunk and so [STRIKE]does[/STRIKE] is my wife.

My wife works hard and she always will.
My wife is ugly and she always will be.


The underlined auxiliaries 'contain' the idea of the lexical verb. BE is self-sufficient.
 

billmcd

Key Member
Joined
Mar 27, 2009
Member Type
English Teacher
Native Language
English
Home Country
United States
Current Location
United States
I hope your wife doesn't review your posts.
 

emsr2d2

Moderator
Staff member
Joined
Jul 28, 2009
Member Type
English Teacher
Native Language
British English
Home Country
UK
Current Location
UK
I've spent most of this post wondering how a pair of shoes which was cheap could ever be anything but cheap. I was hoping that perhaps the pile of cheap shoes in my wardrobe might suddenly have become expensive Jimmy Choos overnight.

Then I realised what it meant. Ah well.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top