[Grammar] giving directions - must/have to

[marker]

Which is better when giving directions? 'Must' or 'have to'?

You must go to the end of Brown Street.
You have to go to the end of Brown Street.

I know it's better to use the imperative or 'should' but if I really wanted to use one of these, which would be more natural/better/grammatically correct?

Thanks for replies in advance

 

[SoothingDave]

Simply "Go to the end of..." is most natural.

 

[marker]

Yes, I know the imperative is most natural but if I wanted to use 'must' or 'have to' then which one would be better?

 

[SoothingDave]

"Have to." Of course, you rarely here "must" in AmE.

 

[marker]

So it's the only reason why you'd use 'have to' in AmE. And I bet in BrE they'd say 'must' then

 

[bhaisahab]

So it's the only reason why you'd use 'have to' in AmE. And I bet in BrE they'd say 'must' then

In BrE we would generally use "have to" if you are only offering a choice between that and "must". We would be far more likely to say "Go to..."