[Grammar] He is the type of person who might appear ...

Status
Not open for further replies.

NAL123

Member
Joined
Mar 14, 2020
Member Type
Student or Learner
Native Language
Hindi
Home Country
India
Current Location
India
https://www.collinsdictionary.com/dictionary/english/might says:

3. MODAL VERB
You use "might" to indicate that something could happen or be true in particular circumstances.

a) (He is) the type of person who might appear in a fashion magazine.

Now consider these sentences, please:

b) He is the type of person who may appear in a fashion magazine.
c) He is the type of person who could appear in a fashion magazine.
d) He is the type of person who can appear in a fashion magazine.

Can I say that sentences a), b) and c) mean the same thing and sentence d) is different? What does sentence d) mean?
 

Charlie Bernstein

VIP Member
Joined
Jan 28, 2009
Member Type
Other
Native Language
English
Home Country
United States
Current Location
United States
https://www.collinsdictionary.com/dictionary/english/might says:

3. MODAL VERB
You use "might" to indicate that something could happen or be true in particular circumstances.

a) (He is) the type of person who might appear in a fashion magazine.

Now consider these sentences, please:

b) He is the type of person who may appear in a fashion magazine.
c) He is the type of person who could appear in a fashion magazine.
d) He is the type of person who can appear in a fashion magazine.

Can I say that sentences a), b) and c) mean the same thing and sentence d) is different? What does sentence d) mean?
For practical purposes, I think they'd all be understood the same way.

As you know, can refers more to ability than likelihood. But in some sense, all four refer to ability — just not as directly. So I don't see an important difference between any of them.

But I'd like to see what others say.
 

NAL123

Member
Joined
Mar 14, 2020
Member Type
Student or Learner
Native Language
Hindi
Home Country
India
Current Location
India
For practical purposes, I think they'd all be understood the same way.

As you know, can refers more to ability than likelihood. But in some sense, all four refer to ability — just not as directly. So I don't see an important difference between any of them.

But I'd like to see what others say.

Can I paraphrase the modals in sentences a), b), c) and d) with: "might"="might be able to"; "may"="may be able to"; "could"="would/might be able to" and "can"="will be able to"?
 

Charlie Bernstein

VIP Member
Joined
Jan 28, 2009
Member Type
Other
Native Language
English
Home Country
United States
Current Location
United States
We wouldn't say "can be able to." The rest to-be-able-tos are wordy but otherwise okay.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top