svetlana14
Senior Member
- Joined
- Dec 5, 2013
- Member Type
- Interested in Language
- Native Language
- Ukrainian
- Home Country
- Ukraine
- Current Location
- Ukraine
Have a look at this bit of the dialogue https://youtu.be/P8dovccdxSI?t=505 8:14-8:25
A. Hear that news about facial recognition this morning, actually?
B. Yeah. Hit me with it.
A. Yes.
Oh, I thought you meant it. Hit you with it. No, I've been done. 700 people have been arrested so far this year because of facial recognition.
I’d like to better understand the logic of the interaction between the speakers.
The word “hit” could be interpreted in two ways in this context:
Then she emphasizes this by replying instead of the man (so she prepared his answer instead so that she was expecting the text of his reply, “No. I’ve been done,” meaning, “No —I was lucky enough. I was not part of that measure. "
Is that correct?
A. Hear that news about facial recognition this morning, actually?
B. Yeah. Hit me with it.
A. Yes.
Oh, I thought you meant it. Hit you with it. No, I've been done. 700 people have been arrested so far this year because of facial recognition.
I’d like to better understand the logic of the interaction between the speakers.
The word “hit” could be interpreted in two ways in this context:
- as someone being surprised or emotionally affected by the news that many people have been arrested, and
- as someone who has actually experienced the consequences of facial recognition personally.
Then she emphasizes this by replying instead of the man (so she prepared his answer instead so that she was expecting the text of his reply, “No. I’ve been done,” meaning, “No —I was lucky enough. I was not part of that measure. "
Is that correct?