[Essay] I need some help to verify my writing

[dongcan]

In “Biomass Power Plants Produce Just as Much Pollution as Coal-Fired Power Plants”, it is argued about that using biomass energy is a renewable energy, therefore, people use it to instead of wood fuel. However, biomass energy produces much pollution than burning wood. In the past decade, the United States government encourages factories to use renewable energy to produce power and provide some benefit to the factories which are using renewable energy. The good circumstance does not last long. The new research shows that “Biomass power plants are notoriously inefficient and actually emit 40-50% more carbon dioxide per megawatt-hour than coals”( Biomass Power). Even though a study which is done in Manomet center provides exact data to proof that biomass energy product more pollution than burning wood. On the other hand, an energy company and biomass industry work together to increase efficiency and reduce pollution, in order to save trees. If fewer trees are cut down every single year, the less carbon dioxide will out of the atmosphere. However, the government does not have advanced science and technology to develop high-efficiency biomass energy to achieve new standard.

Thank you so much in advance any feedback will be greatly appreciated

 

[tedmc]

I need some help to [STRIKE]verify [/STRIKE] check my writing

In the report, “Biomass Power Plants Produce Just as Much Pollution as Coal-Fired Power Plants”, it is argued about that[STRIKE] using[/STRIKE] biomass energy is a renewable energy; therefore, people use it [STRIKE]to[/STRIKE] instead of wood fuel. However, biomass energy produces [STRIKE]much[/STRIKE] more pollution than the burning of wood. In the past decade, the United States government [STRIKE]encourages [/STRIKE] has been encouraging factories to use renewable energy to produce power and [STRIKE]provide[/STRIKE] has been providing some [STRIKE]benefit[/STRIKE] incentives to the factories which [STRIKE]are using[/STRIKE] use renewable energy. The good [STRIKE]circumstance[/STRIKE] times [STRIKE]does [/STRIKE] did not last long. [STRIKE]The[/STRIKE] New research shows that “Biomass power plants are notoriously inefficient and actually emit 40-50% more carbon dioxide per megawatt-hour than coals”( Biomass Power). Even though a study which is done in the Manomet center provides exact data to [STRIKE]proof[/STRIKE] prove that biomass energy [STRIKE]product[/STRIKE] produces more pollution than the burning of wood. On the other hand, an energy company and the biomass industry work together to increase efficiency and reduce pollution, in order to save trees. If fewer trees are cut down every single year,[STRIKE] the [/STRIKE]less carbon dioxide [STRIKE]will out of [/STRIKE] be released to the atmosphere. However, the government does not have advanced science and technology to develop high-efficiency biomass energy to achieve the new standard.

Thank you so much in advance. Any feedback will be greatly appreciated​

 

[teechar]

In “Biomass Power Plants Produce Just as Much Pollution as Coal-Fired Power Plants”, it is argued [STRIKE]about[/STRIKE] that [STRIKE]using[/STRIKE] biomass energy is a renewable energy, and therefore, many people use it [STRIKE]to[/STRIKE] instead of wood fuel. However, biomass energy produces [STRIKE]much[/STRIKE] more pollution than [STRIKE]burning[/STRIKE] does wood. [STRIKE]In[/STRIKE] For the past decade, the United States government has been encouraging [STRIKE]es factories to[/STRIKE] the use of renewable energy in power production [STRIKE]to produce power[/STRIKE] and providing [STRIKE]some benefit[/STRIKE] subsidies and incentives to [STRIKE]the factories which are[/STRIKE] factories using renewable energy. The good circumstance does not last long. [STRIKE]The[/STRIKE] New research shows that “Biomass power plants are notoriously inefficient and actually emit 40-50% more carbon dioxide per megawatt-hour than do coal-burning power plants.” [STRIKE]( Biomass Power). Even though[/STRIKE] In fact, a study [STRIKE]which is done in[/STRIKE] by the Manomet Center provides exact data to [STRIKE]proof[/STRIKE] prove that biomass energy produces more pollution than does the burning of wood. On the other hand, [STRIKE]an[/STRIKE] energy companies and the biomass industry have been working together to increase efficiency, [STRIKE]and[/STRIKE] reduce pollution [STRIKE], in order to save[/STRIKE] and minimize the number of trees cut for fuel production. If fewer trees are cut [STRIKE]down every single[/STRIKE] each year, [STRIKE]the[/STRIKE] less carbon dioxide will [STRIKE]out of[/STRIKE] be emitted to the atmosphere. However, [STRIKE]the[/STRIKE]governments do currently [STRIKE]es[/STRIKE] not have sufficiently advanced science and technology to develop high-efficiency biomass energy to achieve new standard.

I don't understand the text highlighted in blue.

 

[Tarheel]

Biomass Versus Coal

Doncan, you can say "wood" instead of "wood fuel".

 

[dongcan]

thank for your help

thank for your help/
"The good circumstance does not last long" means all good things come to the end.

 

[emsr2d2]

Re: thank for your help

Thank you for your help.
"The good circumstance does not last long" means ​"All good things come to [STRIKE]the[/STRIKE] an end".

Note the corrections above. "All good things [must] come to an end" is a set phrase but it doesn't really fit into your piece.