GoodTaste
Key Member
- Joined
- Feb 19, 2016
- Member Type
- Student or Learner
- Native Language
- Chinese
- Home Country
- China
- Current Location
- China
Their analysis leads Conway and Kochen to conclude that the physicists possess free will—and so do the particles they are measuring. “Our provocative ascription of free will to elementary particles is deliberate,” Conway and Kochen write, “since our theorem asserts that if experimenters have a certain freedom, then particles have exactly the same kind of freedom.” That last part, which ascribes free will to particles, threw me at first; it sounded too woo. Then I recalled that prominent
scientists are advocating panpsychism, the idea that consciousness pervades all matter, not just brains. If we grant electrons consciousness, why not give them free will, too?
Source: Scientific American
Quantum Mechanics, Free Will and the Game of Life
====================================
Does "woo" in the phrase "it sounded too woo" mean "woo-woo"?(Oxford dictionaries define "woo-woo" as "(informal, derogatory)
Relating to or holding unconventional beliefs regarded as having little or no scientific basis, especially those relating to spirituality, mysticism, or alternative medicine."
scientists are advocating panpsychism, the idea that consciousness pervades all matter, not just brains. If we grant electrons consciousness, why not give them free will, too?
Source: Scientific American
Quantum Mechanics, Free Will and the Game of Life
====================================
Does "woo" in the phrase "it sounded too woo" mean "woo-woo"?(Oxford dictionaries define "woo-woo" as "(informal, derogatory)
Relating to or holding unconventional beliefs regarded as having little or no scientific basis, especially those relating to spirituality, mysticism, or alternative medicine."