it's been way too long since we've gone to the mountains.

Status
Not open for further replies.

kadioguy

Key Member
Joined
Mar 4, 2017
Member Type
Student or Learner
Native Language
Chinese
Home Country
Taiwan
Current Location
Taiwan
a. Come on, it's been way too long since we've gone to the mountains. The weather is going to be perfect.

b. You've been working every weekend since you started that new job.

---

1. Why is the perfect aspect used in "since we've gone to the mountains" while the past tense is used in "since you started that new job"?

2. What if we switch their tenses? Would they still be natural?

FYI:
Gemini's answer
ChatGpt's answer
Claude's answer
---

Having read their answers, I'll try to put together an integrated answer below. What do you think?

Q1:
a.
The present perfect tense ("we've gone") is used here because it refers to an action that happened at some unspecified point in the past and continues to have relevance to the present.

The speaker is emphasizing that the time since they last went to the mountains extends up to the present moment. The perfect aspect connects the past action (going to the mountains) to the present situation (they still haven't gone to the mountains).

The sentence emphasizes the current state of not having been to the mountains for a long time and suggests the possibility or desire to go to the mountains again in the future.

b.
The simple past tense ("started") is used here because it refers to a specific, completed action in the past: the person started a new job at a particular point in time. This action is seen as completed and doesn't directly connect to the present in the same way as the first sentence.

The speaker is focusing on the continuous action of working every weekend that began when the listener started the new job. The past tense ("started") simply indicates the time when this continuous action began.

The simple past in the the sentence pinpoints the exact moment when the person began working weekends, which is a definite point in the past. This specific event triggered the ongoing situation of working every weekend, which is expressed using the present perfect continuous ("have been working").

Q2:
a. "It's been way too long since we went to the mountains." (Using simple past instead of present perfect)

This version is perfectly natural and commonly used. It slightly shifts the focus to the last specific instance of going to the mountains, rather than emphasizing the continuous state of not having gone.

You're pinpointing a specific moment in the past when you last went to the mountains, and the emphasis is on the gap of time from that point to the present.

Both versions are acceptable and convey similar meanings, with a subtle difference in emphasis.

b. "You've been working every weekend since you've started that new job." (Using present perfect instead of simple past)

This version is less common and can sound slightly awkward to many native English speakers. It's not strictly incorrect, but it's not the preferred form for a few reasons:

(1) Using the present perfect for both clauses creates a sense of redundancy.
(2) The act of starting a job is typically viewed as a single, completed action in the past, making the simple past more appropriate.
(3) The present perfect implies a continued relevance or potential repetition of starting the job, which doesn't align with the usual understanding of job commencement.

The perfect aspect implies that the action of starting the job is somehow still relevant to the present, which feels slightly redundant because the job starting is typically considered a specific, past event.

This phrasing would suggest that the action of starting the job is ongoing in its influence, which could work if you're emphasizing that the job’s start is still fresh or impacting the present. However, since the job starting is a fixed point in time, the simple past is more common in this context.
 
Last edited:
a. Whenever they went to the mountains before, obviously it's still relevant to the speaker. Why? They want to go again. 🙂

b. This could be seen as a simple statement of fact. (It's probably more than that.) The starting, of course, happened at a specific time.

TDL!
 
a. Whenever they went to the mountains before, obviously it's still relevant to the speaker. Why? They want to go again. 🙂

b. This could be seen as a simple statement of fact. (It's probably more than that.) The starting, of course, happened at a specific time.

TDL!
But I'm not sure which question you're answering: question 1 or question 2? 😅
 
Any confusion is caused by the OP making the opening post way too long. (It looks like he's talking to himself, and I didn't want to butt in on the conversation.)

I responded to the questions labeled "a" and "b" at the beginning and ignored most of the rest.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Any confusion is caused by the OP making the opening post way too long. (It looks like he's talking to himself, and I didn't want to butt in on the conversation.)
OK, my bad. :)

I responded to the questions labeled "a" and "b" at the beginning and ignored most of the rest.
Technically, they are not questions, but two sentences that lead to my questions. My questions are labeled (1) and (2) below.
 
Last edited:
Please don't use acronyms or chatspeak that many members will not understand in the Ask a Teacher forum.
 
Hi all,
I can shorten the integrated answer from post #1 and post it as a reply. If you want me to do that, please let me know. :)
 
Hi all,
I can shorten the integrated answer from post #1 and post it as a reply. If you want me to do that, please let me know. :)
I'd like you to post a version of post #1 that's not based on AI-generated responses. How about you try to come up with own answers to your two questions, based on what you have learned from this forum or from formal study (with a teacher or from a text book)?
 
I'd like you to post a version of post #1 that's not based on AI-generated responses. How about you try to come up with own answers to your two questions, based on what you have learned from this forum or from formal study (with a teacher or from a text book)?
I understand your thoughts, but to be honest, I think that the integrated answer based on AI-generated responses in post #1 looks correct and comprehensive to me. I'm afraid I couldn't come up with a better one.

However, I'm going to try to keep a balance between the AI-generated answers and my opinions below. That is, I'll take some of their answers and add my own thoughts:

a. Come on, it's been way too long since we've gone to the mountains. The weather is going to be perfect.

b. You've been working every weekend since you started that new job.

Q1. Why is the perfect aspect used in "since we've gone to the mountains" while the past tense is used in "since you started that new job"?

Answer: Sentence (a), which uses the present perfect tense, focuses on connecting the past action (going to the mountains) to the present situation (they still haven't gone to the mountains), and suggesting the possibility or desire to go to the mountains again.

While sentence (b), which uses the past simple tense, simply indicates a particular point in time (when she started the new job) at which the continuous action (working every weekend) began. This particular point triggered the ongoing situation of working every weekend.

Q2. What if we switch their tenses? Would they still be natural?

a'. "It's been way too long since we went to the mountains." (Using simple past instead of present perfect)

This version is perfectly natural and commonly used. It slightly shifts the focus to the last specific instance of going to the mountains, rather than emphasizing the continuous state of not having gone.

The use of the past tense has less to do with the ongoing relevance of that past event and more about identifying the moment when it happened.

b'. "You've been working every weekend since you've started that new job." (Using present perfect instead of simple past)

This version is less common and can sound slightly awkward to many native English speakers. It's not strictly incorrect, but it's not the preferred form.

The perfect aspect implies that the action of starting the job is somehow still relevant to the present, which feels slightly redundant because the job starting is typically considered a specific, past event.

Since the job starting is a fixed point in time, the simple past is more common in this context.
 
Last edited:
@sitifan Please don't post in bold and in a large font for no reason.
Note that the usual acronym is "TLDR", meaning "Too long, didn't read".
 
It means that Tarheel substituted the euphemism 'darn' for the word 'd*mn'.
 
In the US, more people see "damn" as a swear/curse word than they do in the UK. Here, it's a perfectly normal word for the majority of people.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Ask a Teacher

If you have a question about the English language and would like to ask one of our many English teachers and language experts, please click the button below to let us know:

(Requires Registration)
Back
Top