[Grammar] John is an American dancer and choreographer, specializing in ...

Status
Not open for further replies.

NAL123

Member
Joined
Mar 14, 2020
Member Type
Student or Learner
Native Language
Hindi
Home Country
India
Current Location
India
Consider this sentence of mine, please:

1) John is an American dancer and choreographer, specializing in contemporary dance.

Can I move the participle clause, in bold, to the front or middle of the main clause, without changing the sentence's meaning?

2) Specializing in contemporary dance, John is an American dancer and choreographer.

3) John, specializing in contemporary dance, is an American dancer and choreographer.
 

tedmc

VIP Member
Joined
Apr 16, 2014
Member Type
Interested in Language
Native Language
Chinese
Home Country
Malaysia
Current Location
Malaysia
Yes, you can, but it is more logical to state the discipline, then the specialisation.
 

PeterCW

Senior Member
Joined
Apr 1, 2020
Member Type
Interested in Language
Native Language
British English
Home Country
England
Current Location
England
Only the first option sounds natural to a native speaker.

Option 3 could be rewritten more naturally as John, a specialist in contemporary dance, is an American dancer and choreographer.
 

tree123

Member
Joined
Feb 9, 2019
Member Type
Student or Learner
Native Language
Chinese
Home Country
China
Current Location
China
I'm not a teacher.

1) John is an American dancer and choreographer, specializing in contemporary dance.


2) Specializing in contemporary dance, John is an American dancer and choreographer.

Would you or someone else please explain why the second sentence is not natural?

When I read the three sentences, I think all of them are grammatically correct, aren't they?, And the differences among the sentences are the different parts are especially stressed.

For example, 'Specializing in contemporary dance' is more stressed in second sentence in contrast of the first sentence in which 'John's identity of an American dancer and choreorgrapher' is underlined.

Am I wrong about this?
3) John, specializing in contemporary dance, is an American dancer and choreographer.

John, who specializes in ..., is an American dancer...

Is this version natural?
 
Last edited:

NAL123

Member
Joined
Mar 14, 2020
Member Type
Student or Learner
Native Language
Hindi
Home Country
India
Current Location
India
Would removing the comma from sentence 1) change its meaning?

1a) John is an American dancer and choreographer specializing in contemporary dance. (without the comma)
 

Tarheel

VIP Member
Joined
Jun 16, 2014
Member Type
Interested in Language
Native Language
American English
Home Country
United States
Current Location
United States
I don't think it changes the meaning, but it is, in my opinion, an improvement.
 

tedmc

VIP Member
Joined
Apr 16, 2014
Member Type
Interested in Language
Native Language
Chinese
Home Country
Malaysia
Current Location
Malaysia
I think "specialized" is more common participle than "specializing" to describe a professional in practice.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top