That's different from what I've always taught about joint vs. individual ownership.
Note the difference between, for example: Joe and Anna’s children (one lot of children: Joe and Anna are their parents) Joe's and Anna's children (two separate lots of children: Joe’s and Anna’s)
If you say Joe and Anna's children, without any other context, it's hard not to interpret that Joe and Anna are the mum and dad of the children. In the context we have in post #1, there's no difficulty in interpreting what the writer means.
If you say Joe and Anna's children, without any other context, it's hard not to interpret that Joe and Anna are the mum and dad of the children. In the context we have in post #1, there's no difficulty in interpreting what the writer means.