symaa
Member
- Joined
- Dec 3, 2010
- Member Type
- Student or Learner
- Native Language
- Arabic
- Home Country
- Morocco
- Current Location
- Morocco
Hello,
I am revising my grammar lessons "Modals" in English grammar in use, advanced, I really found it very detailed and quite complicated and I do not know if it is suitable to my level:-?, I have the intermediate one but it is superficial.
I did not see the difference between these two rules:
I am revising my grammar lessons "Modals" in English grammar in use, advanced, I really found it very detailed and quite complicated and I do not know if it is suitable to my level:-?, I have the intermediate one but it is superficial.
I did not see the difference between these two rules:
-We use
may/might/could (not 'can') + have + past participle to say it is possible that something happened in the past.
-We use might/could (not 'may' or 'can') + have + past participle to say that something was possible in the past, but we know that it did not in fact happen.
Could you please tell me what are the differences between these two examples?
Perhaps it is better to have another edition, because there are many rules that extremely confuse me:-(.
-We use might/could (not 'may' or 'can') + have + past participle to say that something was possible in the past, but we know that it did not in fact happen.
Could you please tell me what are the differences between these two examples?
Perhaps it is better to have another edition, because there are many rules that extremely confuse me:-(.