neither party is prevented from making future claims - unclear meaning

Status
Not open for further replies.

JACEK1

Key Member
Joined
Feb 10, 2013
Member Type
Interested in Language
Native Language
Polish
Home Country
Poland
Current Location
Poland
Hello everybody!

Since the provisions of party X may cause doubts as to time limitation with regards to claims related to the repairs, the owner will not be in a position to take delivery of the ship without first agreeing with party Y that neither party is prevented from making future claims relating to the fire outbreak.

Understanding in the context of the sentence

Since two parties are involved in the dispute over who is to blame for the fire outbreak, I understand that, taking the context of the sentence into account, neither party is prevented from making future claims means that either party is prevented from making future claims or neither party is allowed to make future claims.

Understanding of the bolded phrases without context

If we only take the bolded parts into account without context, the meaning changes.

Neither party is prevented from making future claims means that both parties are free/allowed to make future claims.

Do you agree?

Thank you.

Strictly speaking, two negatives, namely, neither + prevented, give a positive.
 

Tdol

No Longer With Us (RIP)
Staff member
Joined
Nov 13, 2002
Native Language
British English
Home Country
UK
Current Location
Japan
Strictly speaking, two negatives, namely, neither + prevented, give a positive.

Is prevent really a negative? To me, it just means that you can't stop either party from making claims in the future, which is a single negative.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top