Proofreading request

Status
Not open for further replies.

canerkara

Member
Joined
Mar 23, 2017
Member Type
Academic
Native Language
Turkish
Home Country
Turkey
Current Location
Turkey
We would like to thank the reviewer for pointing out this confusing situation about the resolution time of the haemorrhage and for showing our mistake about the resolution time in the Hughes et al.'s study. To clarify the first issue, follow-up periods and clinical course of the patient has been more detailed in ‘Outcome and Follow-up section” as follows and the resolution time of the haemorrhage has been expressed as “at 12th week” instead of “84 days” in the manuscript. Additionally, resolution time reported by Hughes et al. has been corrected as 22 days.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

teechar

Moderator
Staff member
Joined
Feb 18, 2015
Member Type
English Teacher
Native Language
English
Home Country
Iraq
Current Location
Iraq
We would like to thank the reviewer for pointing out [STRIKE]this confusing situation[/STRIKE] the confusion about the resolution time of the haemorrhage and for [STRIKE]showing[/STRIKE] highlighting our mistake [STRIKE]about[/STRIKE] regarding the resolution time in the Hughes et al. study. To clarify the first issue, follow-up periods and the clinical course of the patient [STRIKE]has been[/STRIKE] are now more detailed in the 'Outcome and Follow-up' section as follows, and the resolution time of the haemorrhage has been expressed as “at the 12th week” instead of “84 days” in the manuscript. Additionally, the resolution time reported by Hughes et al. has been corrected as 22 days.
.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top