canerkara
Member
- Joined
- Mar 23, 2017
- Member Type
- Academic
- Native Language
- Turkish
- Home Country
- Turkey
- Current Location
- Turkey
We would like to thank the reviewer for pointing out this confusing situation about the resolution time of the haemorrhage and for showing our mistake about the resolution time in the Hughes et al.'s study. To clarify the first issue, follow-up periods and clinical course of the patient has been more detailed in ‘Outcome and Follow-up section” as follows and the resolution time of the haemorrhage has been expressed as “at 12th week” instead of “84 days” in the manuscript. Additionally, resolution time reported by Hughes et al. has been corrected as 22 days.
Last edited by a moderator: