the Las Vegas monorail that entered operation in 2004 has had to defer the dream

Status
Not open for further replies.

brucecx

New member
Joined
Oct 11, 2012
Member Type
Student or Learner
Native Language
Chinese
Home Country
China
Current Location
UK
Hi, I have a question. Do you think the word enter in the following two sentences is wrong?

1. The Las Vegas monorail that entered operation in 2004 has had to defer the dream of connecting the airport, the Strip and downtown.
from https://ludwig.guru/s/entered+operation

2. The 747 entered service on January 22, 1970, on Pan Am's New York–London route.
from https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Boeing_747
 
Last edited:
Sentence 2 sounds all right.

Sentence 1: Some people might use it. I'd prefer "commenced operations".
 
Hi. I have a question. Do you think the word "enter" in the following two sentences is wrong?

1. The Las Vegas monorail that entered operation in 2004 has had to defer the dream of connecting the airport, the Strip and downtown.
2. The 747 entered service on January 22, 1970, on Pan Am's New York–London route.

Thank you! Unnecessary. Thank us after we help you, by adding the "Thanks" icon to any post you find useful.
Note my corrections and improvements to the layout above.

"Entered service" is the standard term used when talking about when a particular make or model of transport started to be used commercially.
I find "entered operation" unnatural. I'd expect "opened" or "started operating".

Who wrote those two sentences?
 
Note my corrections and improvements to the layout above.

"Entered service" is the standard term used when talking about when a particular make or model of transport started to be used commercially.
I find "entered operation" unnatural. I'd expect "opened" or "started operating".

Who wrote those two sentences?
the first sentence is from online, and the second is from Wikipedia.
 
I found the first sentence is from online, and the second is from Wikipedia.
Note that "online" and "from Wikipedia" wouldn't normally be enough information as a source. However, I have just noticed that you've edited post #1 and added the links to each one. As a rule, we ask that you don't edit posts after they've received a response as it can make some of the responses look nonsensical. We'll leave this one in place but now you know for the future.
 
Note that "online" and "from Wikipedia" wouldn't normally be enough information as a source. However, I have just noticed that you've edited post #1 and added the links to each one. As a rule, we ask that you don't edit posts after they've received a response as it can make some of the responses look nonsensical. We'll leave this one in place but now you know for the future.
Thank you, actually based on my research, the first sentence is from this article on the Guardian https://www.theguardian.com/cities/2015/feb/09/las-vegas-strip-learning-temple-excess I guess the author just made this tiny mistake when he was writing the article.
 
Note my corrections and improvements to the layout above.

"Entered service" is the standard term used when talking about when a particular make or model of transport started to be used commercially.
I find "entered operation" unnatural. I'd expect "opened" or "started operating".

Who wrote those two sentences?
by the way, I have a follow-up question. Can we use "enter service" for a railway line instead of makes or models? like, the China-Laos railway recently entered service
 
Yes. The Monorail was a completely new railway, not just a piece of moving stock.
 
By the way, I have a follow-up question. Can we use "enter service" for a railway line instead of makes or models? Like, the China-Laos railway recently entered service.
Please note that we always capitalize the word that begins a sentence. Also, end a sentence with a period (full stop), question mark or exclamation mark.
 
by the way, I have a follow-up question. Can we use "enter service" for a railway line instead of makes or models? like, the China-Laos railway recently entered service
I'd say "commenced/started operation(s)". A railway is a system rather than a thing.
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top