the strong feeling/a strong feeling that

It has nothing to do with trends, no. We would use 'the' if the noun is in some way already known or otherwise identifiable to the listener. In your example, that seems to be the case. If it's widespread, then it's identifiable. Is that what you mean? Being widespread is not a trend, by the way.



Why do you think so? Remember this important point: The choice of which article to use depends on the context.
The widespread awareness that smoking kills has saved lives/ Widespread awareness that smoking kills has saved lives. Which sounds better?
 
The widespread awareness that smoking kills has saved lives/ Widespread awareness that smoking kills has saved lives. Which sounds better?
In my opinion, the example with "the" works much better than the example without, because you are talking about actually existing widespread awareness:

The widespread awareness that smoking kills has saved lives.

Back in the 1940s or so, when widespread awareness of that fact did not exist (that is, when awareness of that fact was not widespread), the version without "the" (and with "would save" rather than "has saved") would have worked well:

Widespread awareness that smoking kills would save lives.
Indeed, the "a" variant would also work, this indicating "a type of awareness that is widespread":

A widespread awareness that smoking kills would save lives.
 
In my opinion, the example with "the" works much better than the example without, because you are talking about actually existing widespread awareness:

The widespread awareness that smoking kills has saved lives.

Back in the 1940s or so, when widespread awareness of that fact did not exist (that is, when awareness of that fact was not widespread), the version without "the" (and with "would save" rather than "has saved") would have worked well:

Widespread awareness that smoking kills would save lives.
Indeed, the "a" variant would also work, this indicating "a type of awareness that is widespread":

A widespread awareness that smoking kills would save lives.
Thanks a lot for the brilliant examples. Would the same apply if we changed the adjective to "profound"?
 

Ask a Teacher

If you have a question about the English language and would like to ask one of our many English teachers and language experts, please click the button below to let us know:

(Requires Registration)
Back
Top