Tom's father bought a/the new car(,) which has the latest high-tech equipment.

Status
Not open for further replies.

z7655431

Member
Joined
Jan 12, 2016
Member Type
Student or Learner
Native Language
Chinese
Home Country
Taiwan
Current Location
Taiwan
"Tom's father bought a new car which has the latest high-tech equipment."
This is a sentence from my teacher's handout. But I myself expanded it to the following sentences:
a. Tom's father bought a new car which has the latest high-tech equipment.
b. Tom's father bought the new car which has the latest high-tech equipment.
c. Tom's father bought a new car, which has the latest high-tech equipment.
d. Tom's father bought the new car, which has the latest high-tech equipment.
My question is:
Are they all correct? What are the differences between them?

Thanks!
 
Last edited:

bhaisahab

Moderator
Staff member
Joined
Apr 12, 2008
Member Type
Retired English Teacher
Native Language
British English
Home Country
England
Current Location
Ireland
a. is the same as the original. c. and d. are the same.

b., c., and d. are wrong.
 

z7655431

Member
Joined
Jan 12, 2016
Member Type
Student or Learner
Native Language
Chinese
Home Country
Taiwan
Current Location
Taiwan
a. is the same as the original. c. and d. are the same.

b., c., and d. are wrong.
Sorry, d should be: "Tom's father bought the new car, which has the latest high-tech equipment."
Is it still wrong?
 

bhaisahab

Moderator
Staff member
Joined
Apr 12, 2008
Member Type
Retired English Teacher
Native Language
British English
Home Country
England
Current Location
Ireland

Charlie Bernstein

VIP Member
Joined
Jan 28, 2009
Member Type
Other
Native Language
English
Home Country
United States
Current Location
United States
"Tom's father bought a new car which has the latest high-tech equipment."
This is a sentence from my teacher's handout. But I expanded it to the following sentences:

a. Tom's father bought a new car which has the latest high-tech equipment.

You're saying that (a) his car has the latest equipment and (b) there are other cars that also have the latest equipment.

In American English, we would say "that," not "which."

b. Tom's father bought the new car which has the latest high-tech equipment.

You're saying that (a) his car has the latest equipment and (b) it's the only car with the latest equipment.

Again, in American English, we would say "that."

c. Tom's father bought a new car, which has the latest high-tech equipment.

Not good. You're sort of saying that all new cars have the latest equipment, which isn't what you mean. And worse, you're saying it ungrammatically.


d. Tom's father bought the new car, which has the latest high-tech equipment.

You're (a) specifying what particular car he bought and (b) giving us the added information that it has the latest equipment.

My questions are:

Are they all correct? What are the differences among them? [Or more simply: What are the differences?]

See the notes above.


Thanks!

You're welcome!
 

GoesStation

No Longer With Us (RIP)
Joined
Dec 22, 2015
Member Type
Interested in Language
Native Language
American English
Home Country
United States
Current Location
United States
That is correct. What are the differences among them? is not correct in BrE.

It's odd in AmE too, though I wouldn't label it as incorrect. Some people see -tween in between and relate it to the root it shares with "two". From this they derive the "rule" that between can only be used when relating two items. This rule does apply in certain contexts, but the sentence in question isn't one of them.

There's a good explanation of the false etymology and the long-attested use of between for multiple items here. The last paragraph describes the situation we're discussing.
 

Charlie Bernstein

VIP Member
Joined
Jan 28, 2009
Member Type
Other
Native Language
English
Home Country
United States
Current Location
United States
It's odd in AmE too, though I wouldn't label it as incorrect. Some people see -tween in between and relate it to the root it shares with "two". From this they derive the "rule" that between can only be used when relating two items. This rule does apply in certain contexts, but the sentence in question isn't one of them.

There's a good explanation of the false etymology and the long-attested use of between for multiple items here. The last paragraph describes the situation we're discussing.

Thanks, GS. I sit corrected. My English teachers said to always use "among" for more than two people or things, but that was a long time ago.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top