Video with "intact video display" but no sound?

[thincat]

Hi everyone,

How do you feel if some people say they have a "video with 'intact video display' but no sound"? Is it too formal? If yes, how would you put it?
Thank you!

 

[bhaisahab]

Hi everyone,

How do you feel if some people say they have a "video with 'intact video display' but no sound"? Is it too formal? If yes, how would you put it?
Thank you!

If someone said that to me, I wouldn't know what they meant by "intact video display".

 

[Tdol]

The video had no sound/had lost the sound.

 

[thincat]

How about with sound but no "screen"?
Is it called "intact visual display but no sound"?

 

[SoothingDave]

Why would we assume that the video is not "intact"?

Simply say that the video has no sound.

 

[Matthew Wai]

Is it even simpler to say "a soundless video"?

 

[5jj]

Possibly, but we don't.

 

[Tdol]

Is it even simpler to say "a soundless video"?

That could be deliberate like a silent movie.

 

[Barb_D]

The picture is fine, but the audio isn't working.

 

[Matthew Wai]

May I say "audio-defective"?

 

[Rover_KE]

You may say it; native speakers wouldn't.