Was expected to have been...

Status
Not open for further replies.

bartek1988

Member
Joined
Nov 22, 2012
Member Type
Student or Learner
Native Language
Polish
Home Country
Poland
Current Location
Poland
Hello,
I am wondering if my reformulations (1-2) of the original sentence are correct. Thank you for any feedback.

I had expected my car to be delivered yesterday, but there was a problem with the paintwork.

1) My car had been expected to have been delivered yesterday, but there was a problem with the paintwork.
2) My car was expected to have been delivered yesterday, but there was a problem with the paintwork.
 
I think there is no need to use the past perfect tense in the original sentence and in (1). The simple past is good enough.
 
Ok, so Sentence 1 is wrong but 2 is correct?
 
The use of the passive voice makes them both unnatural.
 
They are unnecessarily complicated. Try:

I expected my car to be delivered yesterday, but there was a problem with the paperwork, and it wasn't.
 
I had expected my car to be delivered yesterday
If you want to use the past-perfect passive in the main clause, it would be better to use the active in the infinitive clause:

active: I had expected them to deliver my car yesterday. --> passive: They had been expected to deliver my car yesterday.
 
Ok, so Sentence 1 is wrong but 2 is correct?

Correct in what sense?

My answer is that you've made a mistake by even attempting to transfrom the sentence into the passive voice. Why would you do that? The sentence is fine as it is.

If your specific goal here is for some reason to use the car as the sentence subject, then you could say it like this:

My car was meant to be delivered yesterday, but there was a problem with the paperwork.
 
No BrE speaker would utter that sentence.
It's the same pattern found in:

I had been expected to take out the trash before my parents started making my little brother do it instead.
 
It's the same pattern found in:

I had been expected to take out the trash before my parents started making my little brother do it instead.
It is, and it's correct grammatically.

However, I suspect few native speakers would use both a past perfect and a passive form there.
 
I suspect few native speakers would use both a past perfect and a passive form there.

Well, they would if they had a reason to do so. I mean, if the style, or genre type, or any other aspect of discourse warranted it.
 
Many things are possible but unlikely. In fact, they can be so unlikely that they are not worth spending time on.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Ask a Teacher

If you have a question about the English language and would like to ask one of our many English teachers and language experts, please click the button below to let us know:

(Requires Registration)
Back
Top