What does this mean?

  • Thread starter Cap1034
  • Start date
  • Views : 2,297
Status
Not open for further replies.
C

Cap1034

Guest
There’s a man with a Nose,
And wherever he goes
The people run from him and shout:
“No cotton have we
For our ears if so be
He blow that interminous snout!”
So the lawyers applied
For injunction. “Denied,”
Said the Judge: “the defendant prefixion,
Whate’er it portend,
Appears to transcend
The bounds of this court’s jurisdiction.”

Does this mean, "Don't blow your nose! If you do, we will have no cotton for our ear muffs!"

The story is about the people of a town applying for an injunction to stop the man from blowing his nose, to which the court says, "We have no jurisdiction over the matter."

Am I right?
 
You have nearly got it right. 'We have no cotton wool to stuff in our ears to muffle the sound'.

Please name the author of this poem.
 
This is from the Devil's Dictionary, and I did some searching on the net but to no avail. It looks like a poem written by this author for this particular definition.
 
Last edited:
But isn't this poem ungrammatical?
Because "blow" and "portend" should be accompanied by S.
What do you think?
 
The form without the -s​ suffix is subjunctive. It is grammatically correct, but few people use it these days - In BrE, at least.
 
But what about "whatever it portend"? This is not subjunctive
 
So this is "should" missing here?
What is omitted here is may?
 
So this is "should" missing here?
What is omitted here is may?
Nothing is omitted. I keep telling you - it is a subjunctive ​form.

Today we would probably write whatever it means or whatever it might mean.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Ask a Teacher

If you have a question about the English language and would like to ask one of our many English teachers and language experts, please click the button below to let us know:

(Requires Registration)
Back
Top