who or that

Status
Not open for further replies.

Offroad

Key Member
Joined
Feb 9, 2008
Member Type
Interested in Language
Native Language
Brazilian Portuguese
Home Country
Brazil
Current Location
Brazil
Dear friends...

I would like your opinions on this:

a) I hit my wife's brother that/who was visiting us.
b) Who is this friend? That one that/who lives in France?


Which ones would you choose? Is there any difference between them?

Many thanks
 
a) I hit my wife's brother that/who was visiting us.

Either one is fine, but I'd go with who.

b) Who is this friend? That one that/who lives in France?

That, in this case. However, I would re-write the sentence, so it would look like this: Who is this friend? The one that lives in France?
 
Dear friends...

I would like your opinions on this:

a) I hit my wife's brother that/who was visiting us.
b) Who is this friend? That one that/who lives in France?


Which ones would you choose? Is there any difference between them?

Many thanks


According to me, we can use both that and who in this case. But :
" Do you know the man, who is standing there ?"
We can't replace who by that in the sentence above because of the comma !
 
Simple rule (with few exceptions):

When talking about people, use "who".
When talking about animals/inanimate objects etc, use "that/which" etc.

That's the man who I hit.
I saw my sister-in-law, who was visiting from Germany.
Those are the boys who stole my car.

That's the table that I want to buy.
I saw an aeroplane which was painted bright pink.
There's the dog that bit my brother.
 
According to me, we can use both that and who in this case. But :
" Do you know the man, who is standing there ?"
We can't replace who by that in the sentence above because of the comma !

Sorry but why would someone use comma in that sentence?
 
My understanding of relative pronouns is:

people -> who(subjective)/whom(objective)/whose(possessive)
things/animals -> which
places -> where

Who and which can both be replaced by that but it makes the sentence sound more casual, in formal English that shouldn't be used to replace either of them.

James
 
Last edited:
Sorry but why would someone use comma in that sentence?

Relative Clauses consist : Defining Relative Clauses (DRC) and Non-defining Relative Clauses (NDRC)
I'll give you some examples:
" The large car which uses too much gasoline is hers"
" Her car, which is very large, uses too much gasoline. "

The first sentence is "DRC" and the second is "NDRC"
In the second sentence, "which is very large" is only the supporting information and it is not important to the remains of the sentence : " uses too much gasoline" .
Another example:
"This book, which I borrowed from you, is very interesting."
 
Relative Clauses consist : Defining Relative Clauses (DRC) and Non-defining Relative Clauses (NDRC)
I'll give you some examples:
" The large car which uses too much gasoline is hers"
" Her car, which is very large, uses too much gasoline. "

The first sentence is "DRC" and the second is "NDRC"
In the second sentence, "which is very large" is only the supporting information and it is not important to the remains of the sentence : " uses too much gasoline" .
Another example:
"This book, which I borrowed from you, is very interesting."

All agreed - use of commas in those sentences are required. But the sentence quoted was:

" Do you know the man, who is standing there?"

No comma is required. "Do you know the man who is standing there?"
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Ask a Teacher

If you have a question about the English language and would like to ask one of our many English teachers and language experts, please click the button below to let us know:

(Requires Registration)
Back
Top