widths

Status
Not open for further replies.

Do228

Member
Joined
Dec 18, 2017
Member Type
Other
Native Language
Esperanto
Home Country
Philippines
Current Location
Europe
I find it hard to pronounce the "th" correctly when it's proceeded and followed by consonants.
I mean words like widths, lengths, etc.
Would people understand me if I just say "wids" or "lengds"? Or better replace the "th" with an "f" like some Englanders or Afro-Americans do it?
 

Tdol

No Longer With Us (RIP)
Staff member
Joined
Nov 13, 2002
Native Language
British English
Home Country
UK
Current Location
Japan
I think that /f/ would be easier to understand.
 

emsr2d2

Moderator
Staff member
Joined
Jul 28, 2009
Member Type
English Teacher
Native Language
British English
Home Country
UK
Current Location
UK
One of my Spanish students had the same problem. Initially, I got her to say "wit-th" (which is actually how it sounds when natives say "width" anyway), and then "lenk-th" (again, that's how it comes out from natives). Once she had mastered those, I got her to add the "s" at the end. Her final pronunciation wasn't perfect but it was certainly better than what she started with.
Note that with "wit-th", the first "t" is a sound at the back of the throat, almost a click, rather than with the tongue on the palate to start with.
 

probus

Moderator
Staff member
Joined
Jan 7, 2011
Member Type
Retired English Teacher
Native Language
English
Home Country
Canada
Current Location
Canada
In America some speakers omit the d from widths and the g from lengths. What comes out is withs and lenths. I am not recommending this to learners. I am merely reporting what I have heard.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top