You're under arrest vs you're arrested
- Thread starter mrwroc
- Start date
- Views : 1,476
- Status
GoesStation
No Longer With Us (RIP)
- Joined
- Dec 22, 2015
- Member Type
- Interested in Language
- Native Language
- American English
- Home Country
- United States
- Current Location
- United States
No, it isn't. It's just not idiomatic.
In TV dramas British police are often shown saying "You're nicked!" That means exactly the same thing as "You're arrested" and apparently is or was natural. We don't have an equivalent in American English.
In TV dramas British police are often shown saying "You're nicked!" That means exactly the same thing as "You're arrested" and apparently is or was natural. We don't have an equivalent in American English.
mrwroc
Member
- Joined
- Apr 21, 2020
- Member Type
- Interested in Language
- Native Language
- Polish
- Home Country
- Poland
- Current Location
- Poland
I don't understand. 
You said "You're arrested!" isn't correct and then you used that phrase. So it is correct but means something different than "You're under arrest" or is incorrect?
You said "You're arrested!" isn't correct and then you used that phrase. So it is correct but means something different than "You're under arrest" or is incorrect?
GoesStation
No Longer With Us (RIP)
- Joined
- Dec 22, 2015
- Member Type
- Interested in Language
- Native Language
- American English
- Home Country
- United States
- Current Location
- United States
I don't understand.
You said "You're arrested!" isn't correct and then you used that phrase. So it is correct but means something different than "You're under arrest" or is incorrect?
It's grammatical but unnatural. It's grammatically parallel with "You're nicked," which is (or was) natural in informal British English. There's no way to say why one is natural and the other isn't.
mrwroc
Member
- Joined
- Apr 21, 2020
- Member Type
- Interested in Language
- Native Language
- Polish
- Home Country
- Poland
- Current Location
- Poland
Now it's more clear but:
- In Oxford Learner's Dictionary I found:
- In Cambridge Dictionary I found:
When should I use "be under arrest" and when "be arrested"??
- In Oxford Learner's Dictionary I found:
- In Cambridge Dictionary I found:
When should I use "be under arrest" and when "be arrested"??
GoesStation
No Longer With Us (RIP)
- Joined
- Dec 22, 2015
- Member Type
- Interested in Language
- Native Language
- American English
- Home Country
- United States
- Current Location
- United States
jutfrank
VIP Member
- Joined
- Mar 5, 2014
- Member Type
- English Teacher
- Native Language
- English
- Home Country
- England
- Current Location
- England
You're under arrest = Here, under arrest is an adjective, which describes a state. The verb be is used to link the subject with the adjective.
I was arrested = Here, arrested is the past participle of the verb arrest. This sentence is passive, and so the verb be is used as an auxiliary.
The adjective phrase under arrest is not so much idiomatic as formal (or legal) language. When a police officer arrests you, she says You're under arrest, because a) she must use the correct legal term, and b), she is informing you of your legal status, which is why an adjective is used.
- Status
