|
#1
| |||
| |||
| dictionary says it stands for "am not, have not" isn't "I ain't got no shoes" double negative then? |
|
#2
| ||||
| ||||
| Yes it is, it's very poor English. |
|
#3
| |||
| |||
| oh... ok, I see, I took it from this song YouTube - Nina Simone I Ain't Got No (I Got Life) thanks for reply maybe English is poor, but the song is still great |
|
#4
| ||||
| ||||
| The word "ain't" is nonstandard English. It is also used by many native speakers of English. |
|
#5
| |||
| |||
| It's very common slang; and, like a lot of slang, vivid and rich in meaning: somewhat lower-class, thoroughly unsuitable for any formal setting, to be avoided at all costs by people who are learning English, but indispensable in literature and even life, depending on where you find yourself. Last edited by abaka; 14-Jan-2009 at 23:01. |
|
#6
| |||
| |||
| Ain't was widely used by the upper classes in Britain. The ideas of what was acceptable were more middle class in origin. |
|
#7
| |||
| |||
| Quote:
|
|
#8
| ||||
| ||||
| Ain't it pretty? -- RonBee |
|
#9
| |||
| |||
| Yes. English is a melting pot of languages. In many languages, double negatives are good grammar because they agree. So double negatives have thoroughly infiltrated English in every country, even though they make no sense in our grammar: Two wrongs don't make a right, two rights don't make a left, and two negatives don't make a positive. |
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Tags |
| ain't |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |