These facilities are inherently dual use

Status
Not open for further replies.

GoodTaste

Key Member
Joined
Feb 19, 2016
Member Type
Student or Learner
Native Language
Chinese
Home Country
China
Current Location
China
I understand "These facilities are inherently dual use" as "the use of these facilities is inherently dual." Am I correct?

=============================
But Ebright is not convinced of the need for more than one BSL-4 lab in mainland China. He suspects that the expansion there is a reaction to the networks in the United States and Europe, which he says are also unwarranted. He adds that governments will assume that such excess capacity is for the potential development of bioweapons.
These facilities are inherently dual use,” he says. The prospect of ramping up opportunities to inject monkeys with pathogens also worries, rather than excites, him: “They can run, they can scratch, they can bite.”
Trevan says China’s investment in a BSL-4 lab may, above all, be a way to prove to the world that the nation is competitive. “It is a big status symbol in biology,” he says, “whether it’s a need or not.”

Source: Nature
https://www.nature.com/news/inside-...tudy-world-s-most-dangerous-pathogens-1.21487
 
Ebright believes that the facilities have two purposes. So they are dual-use facilities — and dual-use should be hyphenated.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top