present or past tense
- Thread starter jchtse
- Start date
- Views : 3,589
- Status
kfredson
Senior Member
- Joined
- Dec 13, 2009
- Member Type
- Academic
I don't think it makes sense to say that "life was easy," unless you modify it to show you are dealing with a previous time: "Life was easy, back in the days before the Great War."
I assume that in your sentence you are speaking about life as it is in these times. In that case, the sentence makes sense as you have written it.
Nightmare85
Senior Member
- Joined
- Jul 17, 2009
- Member Type
- Interested in Language
- Native Language
- German
- Home Country
- Germany
- Current Location
- Germany
What about:
I was so naive to believe that life would be easy. :?:
If it's okay, you could switch would be with was/were, or not?
Cheers!
I was so naive to believe that life would be easy. :?:
If it's okay, you could switch would be with was/were, or not?
Cheers!
sarat_106
Key Member
- Joined
- Mar 19, 2008
- Member Type
- English Teacher
- Native Language
- Oriya
- Home Country
- India
- Current Location
- India
Yes, this is a complex sentence and since the verb in the main clause is in the past, the verb of the sub clause should be in the past (was).
Raymott
VIP Member
- Joined
- Jun 29, 2008
- Member Type
- Academic
- Native Language
- English
- Home Country
- Australia
- Current Location
- Australia
I would use 'was'.
euncu
Senior Member
- Joined
- Aug 22, 2009
- Member Type
- Other
- Native Language
- Turkish
- Home Country
- Turkey
- Current Location
- Turkey
kfredson
Senior Member
- Joined
- Dec 13, 2009
- Member Type
- Academic
Yes, you could write "would be" but it does change the sense of the sentence somewhat. And no, I don't think it suggests that "was" is a good alternative.
I still feel that the sentence as originally stated makes perfect sense.
"I was so naive to believe that life is easy."
Yes, you can put it in the past ("life was easy") but this does change the meaning. Generally you would modify this by saying, "I was so naive to believe that life was easy back in those earlier times" (for example.)
But I would love to get more comments on this. There seems to be disagreement. How about those of you Europeans who were enjoying your sleep when this was first posed? What say you?
- Joined
- Apr 12, 2008
- Member Type
- Retired English Teacher
- Native Language
- British English
- Home Country
- England
- Current Location
- Ireland
I would use "was" , but I agree that "is" makes sense. However, there is something I don't like about this sentence, but I can't put my finger on it right now.
kfredson
Senior Member
- Joined
- Dec 13, 2009
- Member Type
- Academic
Why, dear bhaisahab, would you use "was" when you think that "is" makes more sense? I'm interested.
The sentence is, indeed, on the precipice of becoming awkward -- or at least colloquial -- but I actually like it.
- Joined
- Apr 12, 2008
- Member Type
- Retired English Teacher
- Native Language
- British English
- Home Country
- England
- Current Location
- Ireland
I didn't say it makes more sense, just that it makes sense.
- Status
