Could you tell why? I meant to place emphasis on one member.There was no need to use both "just" and "only" in your opening sentence.
Using both of them is unnecessary. Use one or the other for the emphasis you are aiming for.
"There's only just three people here." (Contentious, I suppose. But definitely not "just only".)
Really? I thought "There's three people here" was generally acceptable. This only applies to "there's", not "there is". It's normal in AusE.
In American English it seems to be a fad that has, thankfully, gone away.
There's followed by a plural is normal in American speech, as far as I can tell. Write there are in formal contexts though.
It's normal, common, and natural but not grammatical. "There are" is normal, common, natural, and grammatical.Really? I thought "There's three people here" was generally acceptable. This only applies to "there's", not "there is". It's normal in AusE.
Does everyone speak English in Austria?
For the benefit of learners who might have missed the joke, AusE actually means "Australian English". ;-)