Verb "can" and the verbs of perception

Status
Not open for further replies.

Bassim

VIP Member
Joined
Mar 1, 2008
Member Type
Student or Learner
Native Language
Bosnian
Home Country
Bosnia Herzegovina
Current Location
Sweden
I wonder what is the difference between following sentences:

"I see children playing in the park." and "I can see children playing in the park."

"I hear music in the flat opposite mine." and "I can hear music in the flat opposite mine."

Does the verb "can" mean that the perception is continues while the present without "can" mean a short period of time?
 

5jj

Moderator
Staff member
Joined
Oct 14, 2010
Member Type
English Teacher
Native Language
British English
Home Country
Czech Republic
Current Location
Czech Republic
I wonder what is the difference between following sentences:

1. "I see children playing in the park." and 2."I can see children playing in the park."

1. "I hear music in the flat opposite mine." and 2."I can hear music in the flat opposite mine."

While it is possible for the present simple, as in your #1 examples, to be used to indicate the something perceived at the moment of speaking, it is generally used for regular or repeated examples: I see children / I hear music every day.

We do not normally use continuous forms for the verbs of perception in their literal sense; we use can (when we would use a continuous form with other verbs): I can see children / I can hear music now, as I speak.


Note that we can use the continuous form for these verbs when they have a different meaning, or when the perception is not usual:

Are you still seeing Emma? = going out with her.
I must be tired. I am seeing spots before my eyes.
I'm going mad. I'm hearing things that aren't there.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top