"after" vs "later"

Status
Not open for further replies.

LeTyan

Member
Joined
Dec 18, 2011
Member Type
Interested in Language
Native Language
Chinese
Home Country
China
Current Location
China
Hi,

"After 2 hours, the train will arrive."
" The train arrives 2 hours later."
"The train arrives in 2 hours."

What are the differences among them?

Thank you!
 

MikeNewYork

VIP Member
Joined
Nov 13, 2002
Member Type
Academic
Native Language
American English
Home Country
United States
Current Location
United States
The second and third have the same meaning for me.

The first one is not very natural. Usually I would say: "The train will arrive in 2 hours."
 

Tdol

No Longer With Us (RIP)
Staff member
Joined
Nov 13, 2002
Native Language
British English
Home Country
UK
Current Location
Japan
I don't know if it's BrE, but only the third sounds natural to me.
 

MikeNewYork

VIP Member
Joined
Nov 13, 2002
Member Type
Academic
Native Language
American English
Home Country
United States
Current Location
United States
The only reason I found 2 acceptable is if it were in a narrative story in the present tense.
 

Tdol

No Longer With Us (RIP)
Staff member
Joined
Nov 13, 2002
Native Language
British English
Home Country
UK
Current Location
Japan

LeTyan

Member
Joined
Dec 18, 2011
Member Type
Interested in Language
Native Language
Chinese
Home Country
China
Current Location
China
The second and third have the same meaning for me.

The first one is not very natural. Usually I would say: "The train will arrive in 2 hours."
So is the reason that you found the first one unnatural because "after" was used in future tense?
What about " Something happened, blablablahhh after 2 hours, the train arrived."? Is this natural?
 

MikeNewYork

VIP Member
Joined
Nov 13, 2002
Member Type
Academic
Native Language
American English
Home Country
United States
Current Location
United States
There really isn't anything wrong with using "after" and the future tense. I think the part of the sentence that is unnatural for me is the use of "after" plus a specific time period.

After I finish washing the car, I will cut the grass. :tick:
After two hours, I will cut the grass. :cross:

There may be other contexts in which this will work, but the original train sentence is not good.
 

LeTyan

Member
Joined
Dec 18, 2011
Member Type
Interested in Language
Native Language
Chinese
Home Country
China
Current Location
China
There really isn't anything wrong with using "after" and the future tense. I think the part of the sentence that is unnatural for me is the use of "after" plus a specific time period.

After I finish washing the car, I will cut the grass. :tick:
After two hours, I will cut the grass. :cross:

There may be other contexts in which this will work, but the original train sentence is not good.

Lately I found a sentence on Corpus that seems to counter your argument that one should not put a certain period of time after the word "after".
Now I just feel so lost...


"After an hour I gave up speaking to Ms. Kalleigh's neighbors."

The above is a sentence from corpus. And also, I remember hearing "After a while, blablablah......"
What is going on?
 

LeTyan

Member
Joined
Dec 18, 2011
Member Type
Interested in Language
Native Language
Chinese
Home Country
China
Current Location
China
And also, how about "2 hours later, the train arrived". Is this natural?
 

emsr2d2

Moderator
Staff member
Joined
Jul 28, 2009
Member Type
English Teacher
Native Language
British English
Home Country
UK
Current Location
UK

MikeNewYork

VIP Member
Joined
Nov 13, 2002
Member Type
Academic
Native Language
American English
Home Country
United States
Current Location
United States
<<<"After an hour I gave up speaking to Ms. Kalleigh's neighbors."

The above is a sentence from corpus. And also, I remember hearing "After a while, blablablah......"
What is going on?>>>

We were discussing the future tense. This sentence that you found is in the past tense.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top